HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

seyz

no profile record

投稿

AI Agent Governance: Identity, Delegation and Permissions in Practice

rootcx.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·先月·0 コメント

Agentic AI vs. AI Agents: The Governance Shift

rootcx.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·2 か月前·0 コメント

Code is free, governance is not

rootcx.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·2 か月前·0 コメント

Why Every AI-Coded App Is an Island

rootcx.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·1 コメント

Everything Is Code

rootcx.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

Why Every AI-Coded App Is an Island

rootcx.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: I built an open source and secure infrastructure for internal apps

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

RootCX: A Supabase alternative for internal software

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Rootcx.com – open-source AI agents and internal software

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: RootCX – I built an open source alternative to "Cursor and Supabase"

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

Docker in Docker

docker.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·0 コメント

AWS App Runner availability change

docs.aws.amazon.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·3 か月前·3 コメント

Show HN: Self-hostable AI agents and internal software

github.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·4 か月前·0 コメント

Open source infrastructure (built in Rust) for internal software and AI agents

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·4 か月前·0 コメント

Live – AI that runs your company

polsia.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·5 か月前·0 コメント

Polsia: AI That Runs Your Company

polsia.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·5 か月前·1 コメント

Open Source Is Getting Used to Death

julien.danjou.info
3 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·5 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: ClawBands – Mitigating OpenClaw prompt injection via tool hooks

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·5 か月前·1 コメント

The AI Bolt-On Fallacy

rootcx.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·7 か月前·0 コメント

Constraint-Engineered Development

rootcx.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 seyz·8 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

seyz
·2 か月前·議論
I build a governed infrastructure for internal tools and AI agents: https://rootcx.com

Everybody uses Claude Code or AI coding tools to build internal software, but they lack the governed infrastructure layer required for enterprise trust. RootCX provides that missing foundation. We offer the security, auditability, hosting and permissioning primitives necessary to move internal software from "cool demo" to prod
seyz
·2 か月前·議論
vs rootcx (https://rootcx.com) :D
seyz
·3 か月前·議論
[dead]
seyz
·3 か月前·議論
The return of Arc browser?
seyz
·3 か月前·議論
I'm working on RootCX (https://github.com/RootCX/RootCX), a platform for building and shipping internal apps and AI agents in production.

Think of it like "Claude code on Supabase", but for internal apps and AI agents.

I got tired of choosing the deployment platform, wiring up Postgres, SSO (OIDC), RBAC, audit logs, secret vaults, integrations/tools/MCP, ... from scratch every time I needed an internal tool.
seyz
·3 か月前·議論
MCP versus Skills -> wrong debate. MCP versus CLI -> real debate.
seyz
·3 か月前·議論
Nice launch! It reminds me a lot RootCX (https://github.com/RootCX/RootCX)
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
toxic.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
This is how you gift wrap the agentic era to the open source chinese LLMs. devs don't need the best model, they need one without lawyers attached.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
the real insight here isn't that sizing is broken. Everyone knows that. It's that fixing it would require brands to admit their current customers don't match the label they've been selling them. "You're not a size 6, but size 10" is bad for business
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
Including 999 using Copilot.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
No phd, no funding committee, no peer review anxiety. Just curoisity and paper. Sometimes the breakthrough comes from not knowing the problem was supposed to be difficult. This is what happens when you don't tell a kid something is too hard
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
This is why Ctrl+C is 0x03 and Ctrl+G is the bell. The columns aren't arbitrary. They're the control codes with bit 6 flipped. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Best ASCII explainer I've read.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
The moat here is local inference. Whisper.cpp + Metal gives you <500ms latency on M1 with the small model. no API costs + no privacy concerns. Ship that and you've got something the paid tools can't match. The UI is already solid, the edge is in going fully offline.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
Side projects don't die from lack of time. They die from success anxiety. Shipping means facing judgment. An eternal WIP stays safe in the "potential" zone where it can't disappoint anyone including yourself
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
Debugging an LLM integration without seeing the reasoning is like debugging a microservice with no logs. You end up cargo-culting prompt changes until something works, with no idea why.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
128k tokens sounds great until you see the bill
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
Classic antirez. Does more in 500 LOC than most frameworks in 50k.
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
ok
seyz
·5 か月前·議論
LLM failures go viral because they trigger a "Schadenfreude" response to automation anxiety. If the oracle can't do basic logic, our jobs feel safe for another quarter.

Wrong.