HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sharpfuryz

no profile record

コメント

sharpfuryz
·29 日前·議論
Have you considered rewriting it in Rust? Not for any technical reason (I say it reflexively now)
sharpfuryz
·5 か月前·議論
We are going to see techluddites this year
sharpfuryz
·9 か月前·議論
Bubble/Not bubble, what does that really change? The economy will rise and fall one way or another; it is really in cycles. If the bubble pops, it will be a sharper fall. Unless you own AI, tech stocks - probably not a big deal
sharpfuryz
·9 か月前·議論
AWS/GCP/Azure Cloud turns the audit beast into a house-cat: one IAM rule, one log stream, one firewall and etc. Otherwise, you need to fill out a lot of documents to prove that your bare metal is safe to host, for example, cardholder data.
sharpfuryz
·9 か月前·議論
More like an actor engine than IFTTT, a simple and good tool that can simplify workflows like "daily export data from HubSpot to Google spreadsheet, then send emails."
sharpfuryz
·11 か月前·議論
It's not about a "gotcha." Browsers once supported the GOPHER protocol but dropped it around a decade ago. This serves as an analogy: if users don't use XSLT/XML daily, browsers may eventually drop support for XSLT - supporting features cost money
sharpfuryz
·11 か月前·議論
Do you use it daily in browser?
sharpfuryz
·11 か月前·議論
People have been building things differently for the last 10 years, using json/grpc/graphql (that's why replacing complex formats like xml/wsdl/soap with just JSON is a bad idea), so why train(spend money) AI for legacy tech?
sharpfuryz
·11 か月前·議論
The article is about intentional killing XSLT/XML in the browser. I think it is evolutionary: devs switched to JSON, AI agents don't care at all - they can handle anything; XML just lost naturally, like GOPHER
sharpfuryz
·12 か月前·議論
And somehow I got flagged for my initial comment, which proves my point that open, chaotic, full of real voices already gone.
sharpfuryz
·12 か月前·議論
Hi, ntstr! I am the author of the parent post, and it is not LLM Slop (you can use gpt detectors like zerogpt.com to check text); in fact, only the "call to action" (the last sentence) part was written by LLM, just because I thought that something was missing.

> Is this satire? or trolling? it is concerning that everyone replies to it as if there had been human thought behind this drivel. No satire, no trolling from me. Even if an evil robot wrote this comment, what's wrong with responding to it?
sharpfuryz
·12 か月前·議論
[flagged]