HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sillywabbit

230 カルマ登録 14 年前

投稿

The Only Game Worth Playing

newsletter.calvinrosser.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 sillywabbit·3 か月前·2 コメント

Security vendor slams supplier for delayed notice after staff data exposed

theregister.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 sillywabbit·4 か月前·0 コメント

Veil of Ignorance

en.wikipedia.org
6 ポイント·投稿者 sillywabbit·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

sillywabbit
·昨日·議論
[flagged]
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
Maximizing shareholder value seems like a weird thing to hold as a moral imperative.
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
> AI doesn't exist to make extroverts feel better about themselves

Then why are the extroverts trying to replace engineers with AI?
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
Internet Doomsday Evangelist seems to be a role with infinite chairs.
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
You can store Perl in any file format.
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
I don't think you've seen many biology field data sets.
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
It's not even standard in academia.
sillywabbit
·2 か月前·議論
What? Eddie and Alexei were the heroes of that story, and they got screwed.
sillywabbit
·3 か月前·議論
Assuming that everyone you meet is conspiring against you seems to be a pre-requisite to these. The feasibility of that is questionable.
sillywabbit
·3 か月前·議論
Back in the day, being a teenager and hanging out on freelancing forums was enough.
sillywabbit
·3 か月前·議論
I've also heard good things about Celeste and Silksong.
sillywabbit
·3 か月前·議論
Using the word priors in the way you (and others) do.
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
Could you point me to your research?
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
Meth causes brain damage. Dex doesn't.
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
I used to value this sort of communication. Sometimes I still do. Some feedback I got once that seems relevant to anyone who prefers this style:

----

Key takeways:

1. People are more important than code.

2. People have a right to work in an environment free of perceived hostility.

3. There is a legitimate reason for the perception and hard work may be necessary to understand why this is.

Ask yourself these questions periodically during a conversation:

1. Am I listening to the other person?

2. Is there an equal amount of give and take or is my primary objective to make someone understand my point of view?

3. Does the person want to understand what I am saying?
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
Like the other poster said, the rabbit hole continues with suffix arrays (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_array#Space_efficiency), then compressed suffix arrays (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_suffix_array).

Also explained by the creator of this: https://www.abahgat.com/project/suffix-tree/

> the human genome can be encoded as a 3GB string constructed out of an alphabet of four characters

> As of 2019, a suffix tree indexing the human genome using state of the art algorithms can easily occupy tens of gigabytes.
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
In the event someone is encountering suffix trees for the first time and thinking of using one: the amount of RAM required for suffix trees is obscene.
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
Rushing prematurely into precipitate does sound pretty dangerous.
sillywabbit
·4 か月前·議論
What game-changing insights did the philosophy and political science classes leave out? I'm all ears.
sillywabbit
·5 か月前·議論
Hoodies are very comfortable.