HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sixdonuts

no profile record

コメント

sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
Running a new cable is easy. You just use the old cable to pull the new cable. You can run composite cable if you desire copper, fiber and power.
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
25GB switches do 1/10/25GB, can be used with copper and fiber, use a magnitude less in power per port than a 10GB copper switch and cost the same or less per port than existing 10GB copper switchs.
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
Fiber is way easier to run than copper. If you already have copper just use that to run the fiber.
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
10GB ethernet switches will never be cheap because of the power requirements. Just get a 25GB switch and skip 10GB all together.
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
The Microtik in the link draws 15 watts at idle...
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
If you need 1G or 10GB over copper you can just use a SFP or SFP+ media converter in a 25GB SFP28 switch port. If you have a POE requirement, say for video cameras you either use a dedicated 1GB POE switch or power injector. A 10GBASE-T (RJ-45 copper) switch consumes 3-12 watts per port and a 24 port switch will idle at 50 to 60 watts and run hot. SFP+ and SFP28 ports use under 1 watt per port. I would never recommend a 10GBASE-T copper switch for any use case in this day and age, home or enterprise.
sixdonuts
·3 か月前·議論
Yep, 10gb over copper is not power efficient so any savings you get from getting a cheap 10gb switch will just go to your power bill. Most cost effective and flexible is a used 25gb switch. Most 25gb switches can do 1/10/25gb. 10gb networking has been dead for over 10 years.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
Thousands of orgs have full stack OT/CI apps/services that must run 24/7 365 and are run fully on premise.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
News is one thing, if the app/service down impacts revenue, safety or security you won't be getting any sleep AWS or not.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
No doubt. Reading this thread leads me to believe that almost no one wants to take responsibility for anything anymore, even hiring the right people. Why even hire someone who isn't going to take responsibility for their work and be part of a team? If an org is worried about the "bus factor" they are probably not hiring the right people and/or the org management has poor team building skills.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
Some of the largest orgs have large amounts of IT infrastructure for OT and ISS that is not connected to the Internet. This infra is air gapped or often times on a completely separate physical LAN which is not accessible without passing through multiple physical security controls.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
There are a lot of OT, safety and security infrastructure that must be run on premise in large orgs and require four to five nines of availability. Much of the underlying network, storage, and compute infra for these OT and SS solutions run proprietary OSs based on a BSD OS. BSD OSs are chosen specifically for their performance, security and stability. These solutions will often run for years without a reboot. If a patch is required to resolve a defect or vulnerability it generally does not require a reboot of the kernel and even so these solutions usually have HA/clustering capabilities to allow for NDU (non disruptive upgrades) and zero downtime of the IT infra solution.
sixdonuts
·7 か月前·議論
The BSD/Illumos OSs are used quite frequently as the base OS for high end commercial/enterprise network, SAN, NAS etc. solutions. They are chosen for it's performance, stability and HA features.
sixdonuts
·8 か月前·議論
Yep, started on PF and the Palo and NSX FWs I use at the day job are a piece of cake.