HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

smcnc

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 smcnc·2 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
One thing I noticed on the CS PhD side of the house is because many researchers don't want others to easily build upon their work (for whatever reasons), they don't often release the source code/data required to quickly validate it. This is a recipe for shortcuts, errors, and even in the worst cases, fraud.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
We’re both #DudesForKamala
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
I was merely responding to replies directed at me. But that is probably good advice. No opinion was ever changed online. :)
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
“Flee and reside in hotels” not equal to relocate and continue mission. The major operational staff at these bases still work there. Support was relocated not fleeing.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
US soldiers get hotels when fleeing? Wtf lol
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
[flagged]
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
[flagged]
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
US blew up C-130s stuck in sand. A few got shot up. Iranians on the ground got the brunt of the bullets, however.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
There’s a difference between occupation (where this wins) and deterrence (where they can’t attack your country). The latter was the primary objective.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease to exist, no? It just loses interest and moves on. Nobody attacks the US because they would lose.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
This is now Vietnam with no boots on the ground or years of war? Wow! Thanks
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
More leverage with less conventional firepower? Objectives of reducing conventional military threats and nuclear weapons seem less now, no?
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Uncertainty.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
> 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Agree with same comment as above.

> This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Cost of insurance for ships did.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Search and rescue. Yes, it takes assets. Correct.
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
Insightful
smcnc
·3 か月前·議論
[flagged]