sn9·8 時間前·議論OCaml is such an obvious solution to their problem that I'm shocked it wasn't even mentioned. You get fast compile times without sacrificing type safety.
sn9·8 時間前·議論You can take advantage of spaced repetition just for scheduling the review of proofs and problems you've solved before.By review, I mean attempting to solve them like you're seeing the problem statement for the first time.
sn9·8 時間前·議論You were actually using spaced repetition implicitly whereas they were using flashcards to cram.The issue wasn't the flashcards but their own failure to use them effectively.
sn9·8 時間前·議論"Active recall" specifically (aka the testing effect [0]), as opposed to passive recall like rereading.[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testing_effect
sn9·一昨日·議論The thing about Scheme is that learning the syntax takes 10 minutes and then you can just focus on computation.
sn9·16 日前·議論To the extent that you use AI at all, it should be to accelerate your own understanding in ways that are independently verifiable/falsifiable.AI amplifies what you are.If you take shortcuts in your education, you will remain mediocre.If you dive deep in your understanding, building a broad and deep foundation, then you will be exponentially more powerful.
sn9·26 日前·議論Most UIs in practice boil down to state machines which are extremely amenable to formal verification.Hillel Wayne's writing is a good starting place to learn more: https://www.hillelwayne.com/formally-specifying-uis/
sn9·先月·議論Types replace entire classes of tests that coverage metrics wouldn't detect [0].Types are also documentation!They also decrease the degrees of freedom LLMs have to make mistakes [1].[0] https://kevinmahoney.co.uk/articles/tests-vs-types/[1] https://john.regehr.org/writing/zero_dof_programming.html
sn9·2 か月前·議論Have you considered incorporating formal modelling?Like:[0] https://csci1710.github.io/2026/ and https://forge-fm.github.io/book/2026/[1] https://elliotswart.github.io/pragmaticformalmodeling/[2] https://quint.sh/
sn9·2 か月前·議論Everyone should Jimmy Koppel's post on what abstractions are and aren't: https://www.pathsensitive.com/2022/03/abstraction-not-what-y...Anyone claiming LLMs are an a higher level of abstraction are not using it in the way used by programmers and computer scientists.They're usually conflating "delegation" and "abstraction", as if a junior developer is an abstraction.
sn9·2 か月前·議論To disambiguate search results in the future, I've had great luck appending "lang" like so: "roadmap 2026 rust lang".
sn9·2 か月前·議論I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.
sn9·2 か月前·議論I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.