HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

sorrythanks

no profile record

コメント

sorrythanks
·6 か月前·議論
this is so true. i wrote a document in org and i'm still in the hospital after crashing into someone's markdown file
sorrythanks
·8 か月前·議論
Unless the designer removes the id, or the engineer introduces new output that is not styled.
sorrythanks
·8 か月前·議論
Yes. Mostly because:

• JSX is well understood by a lot of developers • support is already built in to text editors • it is understood by typescript
sorrythanks
·8 か月前·議論
almost all code looks like nonsense when you're unfamiliar with it
sorrythanks
·9 か月前·議論
question: why not make all strings multi-line, and drop a syntax/concept?
sorrythanks
·9 か月前·議論
maybe i'm too far gone, but this doesn't even feel hacky to me. the key needs to be a unique number, -1 and 1 are two different numbers.
sorrythanks
·9 か月前·議論
i don't understand the connection
sorrythanks
·9 か月前·議論
type in your own accent, it works when we talk
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
"console", "terminal" and "terminal emulator" all refer to the same thing. "shell" is the read-eval-print-loop interface you use to work in the terminal.
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
their point is that it has not yet taken place, so shouldn't be talked about using past tense
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
There are things that are true
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
I love the ideas of Smalltalk and Lisp machines too. Do you know of anything promising in that area? (other than Ink & Switch)
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
This comment isn't about living without a bank card or wire payments, though? It's about living with a hardware TOTP device
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
It'd be cool to see something like the recent Automerge/Godot thing built into a music making application.

https://www.inkandswitch.com/project/beckett/
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
REAPER is used professionally by many.

and it's more "nagware" than "crippleware"
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
That's a nice idea! My main bank still provides one of those little TOTP devices to this day.
sorrythanks
·10 か月前·議論
> I think the bank has the right to say "your machine is too risky - we don't want our code to run on it."

I disagree. Let's go with preferring user agency until banks are in trouble.

> Again, it probably isn't fair to ban users who run on permissive software, but it is a rational choice by the manufacturer. And, yet again, I think software authors probably should be able to restrict things which cause them harm.

I disagree. Ban users when they cheat, not when they have the power to cheat.
sorrythanks
·11 か月前·議論
Am I reading an AI summary of an article about a press release?
sorrythanks
·11 か月前·議論
There's also a form here for direct feedback on this topic to Google that may or may not be worth filling out:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITk...
sorrythanks
·11 か月前·議論
Wouldn't a third large phone os have the same problems as GrapheneOS?