Schieffer : For one, I don't recall MLK or R.Parks running off & hiding in China
cbsnews.com1 ポイント投稿者 spitx-1 コメント
Third, public transportation is generally valued more highly here than
in other places for a variety of reasons.
If various professionals employed by the state were paid in accordance of their value to the society (even if only to a certain slice of society), members of the armed forces would be centi-millionaires. As an Austrian, NATO was never there to protect us.
America was admired for setting an example as a
great nation where people can live freely.
What, in the civilized lands of Stiegl, has ever threatened the free
movement and assembly of people, at least since the downfall of the
Austro-Hungarian empire?
And what has prevented Austrians from immigrating to the shores of
America, like the Germans, Swedes and the Dutch? “Il faut cesser de penser et se retrousser les manches.”
(Roughly translated: "We must stop thinking and roll up our sleeves.")
In proposing a tax-cut law last week, Finance Minister Christine
Lagarde bluntly advised the French people to abandon their
“old national habit.”
“France is a country that thinks,” she told the National Assembly.
“There is hardly an ideology that we haven’t turned into a theory.
We have in our libraries enough to talk about for centuries to
come. This is why I would like to tell you: Enough thinking,
already. Roll up your sleeves.”
Source: "And then there is France. In the realms of cultural,
diplomatic, linguistic or economic policies, the French
have long and eloquently insisted on their nation's
"exceptionalism." Yet a new form of exceptionalism,
no less eloquent, though far more brutal, now burdens
them: since 2011, France has seen at least a dozen men
and women who have either set, or tried to set,
themselves aflame.
The cradle of the Enlightenment, France now glimpses
a very different light, one that makes visible the
darkness of its economic and social malaise.
The series of self-immolations has ranged across the
country, from Flanders in the north through the suburbs
of Paris to the Pyrenees in the south. No less varied
are the workplaces to each of these suicides: a lycée
teacher, a carpenter, a company manager. Moreover,
there is a mix of class and ethnic backgrounds: among
the victims are so-called "français de souche" (white
and native born French) as well as foreign nationals
who had lived for years in France.
Beyond the static of differences, though, one can see
common and disconcerting themes. In all of these cases,
the victim was either unemployed or employed in a
position whose pressures ultimately grew intolerable.
In the town of Beziers, a mathematics teacher slightly
more than a year ago set herself on fire in the
school's courtyard--an "act of desperation" that
investigators attributed to "professional reasons."
Last summer in the Parisian suburb of Mantes-la-Jolie,
an unemployed man, learning his welfare benefits had
come to an end, immolated himself outside the local
unemployment office. In 2011, a France-Telecom employee
in the southern city of Orange set a match to his
gasoline-drench clothing in a parking lot near his
office building--one among several suicides at the
company since it began to lay off employees in its
effort to restructure."
Source: "The arc of human progress is an illusory one"
or "The arc of human progress - as defined by the narrow parameters of decreasing
number of recorded human conflicts and genocides, declining number of
incurable devastating medical conditions, improving/degenerating overall
environmental health of the planet etc - is an illusory one."
or "true human progress is illusory" (whatever the parameters that determine it)
However what cannot be denied is that "liberal humanism", as Gray puts it, has come to wield the "pervasive power" it has now, in large part due to the advancements made by the West in the fields of science, technology and medicine and not despite of those advancements. 1. Knowledge is an absolute necessary element for the overcoming of
"cultural backwardness, blindness and folly" and to advance
"to ever more elevated stages of enlightenment and
civilization" and thereby the progress of humans.
2. Human knowledge is said to be limited.
3. Ergo, human progress will always be stunted by the said natural
limit of knowledge.
4. Further: There is no necessary condition that prevents humans from
reverting to the ways of the past once that limit has been reached. Animals with highly developed brains never simply accept
their fates. After all, they understand that if they
manipulate nature in certain ways, at least some parts
of their fate can be averted!
Your argument has the appearance of something that's badly contrived (or derived). 1. The human brain consists of a finite number of particles
and energy states.
2. This matrix of particles and energy states is less than
what exists in the cosmos.
Ergo: The human brain has insufficient capacity to contain
a matrix containing the total map of all the particles and
energy states that exist in the cosmos.
Ergo: A human's knowledge is limited.
Further: All of the humans that exist, or will ever exist,
will always comprise a subset of the cosmos; Ergo, the
collective knowledge of humanity is also limited.
Argument dismantling the aforementioned That isn't convincing. All you have shown is there is not
a one to one ratio of particles in a human brain and the
sum of the universe. This isn't an indication of epistemic
limitation. Although, I agree we have epistemic limitations.
If a natural upper limit does exist - that also stunts our ability to rise above certain petty disputes arising out of a set of very human instincts such as ego, vanity and
self-preservation - then progress could indeed be an illusory concept. "They (NSA) have prevented a very large number of harmful actions"
"I don't see any alternative to trying to track all these groups
around the world who are trying to wreck the ordinary operations
of life in America and probably kill a lot of people. I am not
persuaded that they (NSA) have done more harm than good"
In an increasingly uncertain world, the opinion among most American leaders and figureheads, on either side of the aisle, about the need for increased domestic and international surveillance, has already calcified.
However, Google, Facebook, Apple and others could do a whole lot more to pique interest of the general population in areas of space exploration and spatial phenomenon.
Newscasts devote so little time to areas of space exploration, it is appalling. You can bet you won't miss a single instance of the latest jury trial action of some manslaughter of the month, though.