HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

spokesbeing

no profile record

コメント

spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
Of course but that's not what the parent comment is asking clarification on. Dividends are, generally, not taxed at income tax rate if you are buy and hold. They are taxed at CG rate.

A bigger downside of dividends is that you can't offset qualified dividends income with capital losses (except up to the $3000 annual limit). And compounding is different because you pay tax only at the end rather than every year. But those are different issues.

While I'm at there's the additional wrinkle that being able to actually get a significant LTCG rate difference by deferring the income really depends on structure of your future income and when in your lifetime you will sell.
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
"Qualified dividends" are taxed the same as capital gains. To be qualified mostly depends on a minimum holding time, 60 days for common stock.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_dividend
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
Having done both far more than that, that's not my experience. I have had wildly visual mushroom trips (at higher dosages) and subtly visual LSD trips (at lower dosages). At comparable dosages and settings the main difference to me is just the duration.

Mushrooms in particular are hard to standardize a dosage of. Eat enough of some strong ones and things get plenty visual.
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
Huh? None of this is true for a lot of core recent work. A very obvious example is transformers, which did not come out of academic research (or DeepMind for that matter) at all.
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
This is not correct. Both DeepMind and Brain had/have separate applied groups. A lot of Brain research was/is not product focused at all. Transformers I'd say are more impactful than any other research innovation in the current AI boom and came from Brain not DM. DM does do great PR.
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
Sport hunting doesn't help keep the population down though:

https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/texas-has-a-feral-hog-...
spokesbeing
·3 年前·議論
Old Norse accounts for about 5% of English vocabulary, including very common everyday words, not regional. Examples: egg, knife, sky, skill, etc, etc. Tons of core vocab.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Old...