HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

steffs

no profile record

投稿

Show HN: HiveSpace – GitLab Runner Health Dashboard

hivespace.io
1 ポイント·投稿者 steffs·6 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Foom.ist: When silicon surpasses human brainpower

foom.ist
1 ポイント·投稿者 steffs·6 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[dead]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
steffs
·3 か月前·議論
The onion model is the right mental frame. The nastiest failures are often not obviously bad SQL, they are valid queries that become dangerous only after the planner sees real cardinalities. Row limits and statement timeouts help, but a query can still thrash caches or hold locks before timeout hits. Is your pre execution cost check based on an EXPLAIN style plan with relation level budgets, or is it mostly AST heuristics plus database backstops? That boundary usually decides whether something feels safe enough for production data.
steffs
·3 か月前·議論
[dead]