HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

tedchs

no profile record

コメント

tedchs
·2 か月前·議論
How many more examples of malware postinstall scripts do we need before Node quits running them by default, without warning?
tedchs
·2 か月前·議論
This is another indicator that "lifecycle" scripts in NPM (or other packaging systems, except perhaps Debian or RPM) are an idea we need to learn to live without. At most, packages should be able to emit a message to the user asking them to invoke a one-liner if a setup action is truly necessary.

As a side benefit, eliminating package scripts will contribute toward reproducibility of Docker and VM images.

I realize this will be a controversial opinion.
tedchs
·2 か月前·議論
How does this compare to Temporal? That seems to be the current baseline for application-oriented workflow engines.
tedchs
·5 か月前·議論
The "buy me a coffee" button at the end is :chefskiss:
tedchs
·5 か月前·議論
I was excited about this idea, but based on the writing patterns and vague stories I'm pretty sure these writeups are mostly AI slop. For example, this is classic ChatGPT phrasing:

> The growth I’d been celebrating wasn’t real growth—it was just a spike of first-time buyers who never came back.

If I'm wrong, and these were actually written by a human, I'd love a chance to stand corrected and apologize.
tedchs
·7 か月前·議論
My favorite section in an RFC is "alternatives considered". I've seen many times that an option that had been initially discarded became the solution after review and discussion. It's also a great way to answer later questions about "why didn't you do X instead".
tedchs
·9 か月前·議論
Just imagine being the designer of this thing and sitting at Thanksgiving dinner with your family. "Oh, tedchs, what've you been up to at work?" "Okay well this is gonna sound odd but we invented a camera for your stool... No, not that stool... Yes, it clips onto the bowl..."
tedchs
·9 か月前·議論
Is this announcement just about the gem and bundler packages themselves? I don't think Ruby core team is taking over the rubygems.org site right?