HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

terminalshort

no profile record

コメント

terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
[dead]
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
[dead]
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
My "plan" is don't make big long term plans
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
The doesn't cause acid rain version is called "clean" and that seems pretty fair to me when the other version causes acid rain.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Smart people know that you can't predict or plan for anything on anywhere close to that time horizon. The only plan is be adaptable.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Depends on the mutation, but it could be as little as 1. A single mutation could turn the virus inert, therefore making it legal.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
[flagged]
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
[flagged]
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Because it's the government they voted in. Typical American take. Wanting no responsibility for the adverse effects of your decision.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Didn't happen
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
The fact that Iran has now launched missiles at civilian areas in a dozen or so countries unrelated to the war shows that this is clearly false.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Yeah, things change. What do you propose to do about that? The only people who lose are the ones who can't accept that they may need to change careers to make more money.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
To use your example of someone working on the plumbing of an accounts payable system, who is passionate about that? The supply is near zero. That, like most jobs, is going to need to be done entirely by people who are just doing it for the money, and there is nothing wrong with that.

Your example runs counter to the laws of supply and demand too. You understand that wages will rise when supply is restricted, but you don't want to accept that supply will respond to the price signal in the form of more people entering that job market.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
The mall cop much more so than the ICC
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Yes, the US and not just the presidency. If it was just the presidency then he would have been impeached by congress for usurping their constitutional authority.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
They have the power to enforce laws
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
If you and I, the president, congress, and the judiciary agree, then yes, and that's kind of the situation regarding the laws around starting a war.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
No it's not and neither is Afroman's statement. But the comment I was replying to said it was a fair statement, not merely that it is not defamatory.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
That's exactly correct. Laws are not a physical entity and therefore their existence is predicated entirely on collective agreement.
terminalshort
·4 か月前·議論
Of course it's not defamation. But that's not what you said. You said "seems fair"