HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

tesseract

no profile record

コメント

tesseract
·2 か月前·議論
And are often _encouraged_ to be wasteful by "use it or lose it" type provisions.
tesseract
·2 か月前·議論
> there is that CO2 on the air that we actually want to get rid of

For this reason I have long been slightly baffled that development of compostable/biodegradable bio-based plastics is such a priority in materials research. Sure, it's interesting in the very long run, but for the foreseeable future, converting atmospheric CO2 (via plants as an initial step) into a long lived, inert material that can just be buried after an initial use seems like a benefit.
tesseract
·2 か月前·議論
What with so many fans, it shouldn't be too surprising that jokes are just blowing every which way.
tesseract
·3 か月前·議論
"Side hassles"... hahaha. Love it.
tesseract
·3 か月前·議論
That's pretty much what a food co-op is supposed to be.
tesseract
·4 か月前·議論
American food contains maize, obviously. This works for multiple understandings of the word "American" :)
tesseract
·9 か月前·議論
That is true but it's also an infamously unusual aspect of the Bay Area.
tesseract
·10 か月前·議論
Many of those big bells in other cultures are on fixed mountings (in a carillon, for instance). The idea of mounting the bell on a rotating wheel - which imposes limits on what music can be played due to the rotational inertia of the wheel, therefore leading to a unique style of composition - is distinctively English.
tesseract
·10 か月前·議論
More likely a hall effect sensor, which is solid state and a lot smaller. And yes, older MacBooks had something like that, as evidenced by the fact you could put them to sleep by holding a magnet in the right place (just to the left of the trackpad IIRC in the models I'm familiar with)
tesseract
·昨年·議論
Telemetry was included in what was open sourced, e.g. <https://github.com/google/pebble/blob/3b927684809fba173ee540...>

My read of that caveat from Google is that the code that was removed was third party code that Pebble had a proprietary license to use, thus it was not Google's to release.
tesseract
·3 年前·議論
Good ergonomics for Perl-style quick and dirty text processing were part of the original design goals for Ruby. Those parts of the language are still there. You can write code that feels more concise than Python yet, IMO, tends to be more readable/maintainable than Perl can stereotypically be. Modern style guides, however, de-emphasize that style of Ruby since it might not be the most appropriate in the context of say a large Rails project.
tesseract
·5 年前·議論
Probably even more information of that nature is hidden in Facebook Groups where it was never searchable in the first place.
tesseract
·11 年前·議論
Polycarbonate doesn't have any chlorine at all in its chemical formula. Maybe the usual types of Lexan contain plasticizers/flame retardants/other additives that contain chlorine?