You seem to know about this stuff. All day every day literally at least 40 identifiable wifi signals pass straight through my brain (I'm in an apartment building) just at the moment there are at least 5. If we assume the same amount of radiation can pass through a subject without damage, then how much information is recoverable if you had lots of very expensive scanning equipment around the head? (I mean from specifically gigahertz, i.e. Wifi, range signals).
I mean surely it's not 0, but is it the sort of thing that if the same subject were sitting in a chair for 1,000 hours, then a quite lossy picture of neural interconnects could be had? (Over a period of months.)
Most people wake up every day more or less the same, with the same reasoning capabilities (barring a few things they learned the previous day, or dreamt about in their sleep), lots of neurons die, it's a pretty lossy little neural net, so I don't think it needs that much fidelity and I think it's no problem if the same subject sits in for months and months.
though you talk about the method mentioned by the article, the article mentions that the resolution this gets down to is 0.39 ångströms. The cell body of a neuron is across 1,000,000 ångströms across. far less fidelity is needed.
so I'm curious about whether any information is recoverable from wifi-range scanning, and what would happen if you scanned the same subject for thousands of hours over the course of months.
I mean surely it's not 0, but is it the sort of thing that if the same subject were sitting in a chair for 1,000 hours, then a quite lossy picture of neural interconnects could be had? (Over a period of months.)
Most people wake up every day more or less the same, with the same reasoning capabilities (barring a few things they learned the previous day, or dreamt about in their sleep), lots of neurons die, it's a pretty lossy little neural net, so I don't think it needs that much fidelity and I think it's no problem if the same subject sits in for months and months.
though you talk about the method mentioned by the article, the article mentions that the resolution this gets down to is 0.39 ångströms. The cell body of a neuron is across 1,000,000 ångströms across. far less fidelity is needed.
so I'm curious about whether any information is recoverable from wifi-range scanning, and what would happen if you scanned the same subject for thousands of hours over the course of months.