HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

timini

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·先月·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agents

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·1 コメント

HaluMem: Evaluating Hallucinations in Memory Systems of Agents

arxiv.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·1 コメント

The OpenHands Software Agent SDK: Composable and Extensible

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·8 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

Why Foundation Models in Pathology Are Failing

rewire.it
10 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 timini·9 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

timini
·先月·議論
The inverse of grill-me: instead of Claude extracting what you know, it teaches you what it knows. It quizzes before it explains, schedules reviews with a simplified FSRS and can drill you on any topic, a document, or your own codebase
timini
·5 か月前·議論
clearly this is a plat to own all the agent traces for further training
timini
·5 か月前·議論
clearly this is a play to own all the agentic traces for further training
timini
·8 か月前·議論
This paper evaluates three control strategies for untrusted agents: deferral to trusted models, resampling, and critical action deferral. Initial testing showed resampling and critical action deferral achieving 96% safety. However, adversarial testing revealed resampling crashes to 17% safety when attackers can detect resampling or simulate monitors, while critical action deferral remained robust against all attack strategies.
timini
·8 か月前·議論
HaluMem introduces the first benchmark for evaluating hallucinations in agent memory systems at the operation level. Through three evaluation tasks (memory extraction, updating, and question answering), it reveals that existing memory systems generate and accumulate hallucinations during early stages, which then propagate errors downstream. The benchmark uses two datasets spanning different context scales to systematically reveal these failure modes.
timini
·8 か月前·議論
OpenHands SDK provides a complete architectural redesign for building production software development agents. It balances simplicity (few lines of code for basic agents) with extensibility (custom tools, memory management) while delivering seamless local-to-remote execution, integrated security, and connections to various interfaces (VS Code, command line, APIs).
timini
·8 か月前·議論
not sure there are any agents yet

but there are some research like

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15103
timini
·8 か月前·議論
judging by this article, no
timini
·9 か月前·議論
TL;DR Problem: "Tool overload" is a critical bottleneck for AI agents. Providing an LLM with a large, static list of tools bloats the context window, degrading performance, increasing costs, and reducing accuracy. Solution: Implement a "select, then execute" architectural pattern. Use a lightweight "router" agent to first retrieve a small, relevant subset of tools for a specific task. Then, a more capable "specialist" agent uses that curated set to execute the request. Benefits: Lower latency and cost (fewer tokens), higher tool-selection precision, a scalable architecture for large tool catalogs, and improved reliability. Pattern: This pattern is a form of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) applied to tools, often called Retrieval-Augmented Tool Selection (RATS). It can be combined with State-Based Gating for even greater precision. How: This post provides a complete, production-aware implementation using Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK).