What's puzzling is ingesting and indexing speed. That part of the test set was 60 times slower than clickhouse. So, whatever Clickhouse takes a day to ingest, Tablespace will take 2 months. Also, massive 13x overhead for storage makes things look even stranger.
All of the above + your benchmark results https://tinyurl.com/4yz87ur4 show that you did trade off visibly improving 9 queries out of 43 at massive expense of disk space and ingest speed. Okay, I guess, maybe there's a usecase for that. But I would not call it a 1.6x speedup over Clickhouse, this is purely misleading.
All of the above + your benchmark results https://tinyurl.com/4yz87ur4 show that you did trade off visibly improving 9 queries out of 43 at massive expense of disk space and ingest speed. Okay, I guess, maybe there's a usecase for that. But I would not call it a 1.6x speedup over Clickhouse, this is purely misleading.