HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

trq_

665 カルマ登録 14 年前
Building Claude Code, I post a lot on X at @trq212

投稿

Show HN: Write Stories by Steering a LLM

latentlit.goodfire.ai
2 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·昨年·0 コメント

LLM-Powered Sorting with TrueSkill

thariq.io
5 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·昨年·1 コメント

Show HN: Opensourcing Sparse Autoencoders for Llama 3.3 70B

huggingface.co
1 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·2 年前·0 コメント

Show HN: Llama 3.3 70B Sparse Autoencoders with API access

goodfire.ai
201 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·2 年前·51 コメント

Should Developers care about AI Interpretability?

thariq.io
10 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·2 年前·0 コメント

Detecting when LLMs are uncertain

thariq.io
283 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·2 年前·165 コメント

Claude Computer Use – Is Vision the Ultimate API?

thariq.io
113 ポイント·投稿者 trq_·2 年前·90 コメント

コメント

trq_
·12 日前·議論
hi guys, this is my change- will patch it to be an opt-in
trq_
·2 か月前·議論
Hi there, Thariq from the Claude team here. Sorry this is happening, we'll fix it ASAP.

We don't want anyone to feel locked into the tool. Claude's designs are HTML/CSS/JS that any editor can handle; we'll make sure it's possible to download them even after you unsubscribe.
trq_
·3 か月前·議論
Hey everyone, Thariq from the Claude Code team.

We've been on this since the bug surfaced. Everyone affected is getting a full refund and an extra grant of usage credits equal to their monthly subscription as our apology. You can see my original post here: https://x.com/trq212/status/2048495545375990245. We’re still working on sending emails to everyone affected.

Our support flow wasn't set up to route a complex bug like this to engineering. We’re hoping to make this better but will take some time. Sorry to everyone caught up in it.
trq_
·3 か月前·議論
Hi, it's Thariq from the Claude Code team here.

Sorry to hear, was wondering if you could find a session where this happens and hit /feedback and just say something like stop hook not firing and we'll take a look.
trq_
·4 か月前·議論
Claude Code is not an electron app.
trq_
·6 か月前·議論
Yes, we do but harnesses are hard to eval, people use them across a huge variety of tasks and sometimes different behaviors tradeoff against each other. We have added some evals to catch this one in particular.
trq_
·6 か月前·議論
Hi everyone, Thariq from the Claude Code team here.

Thanks for reporting this. We fixed a Claude Code harness issue that was introduced on 1/26. This was rolled back on 1/28 as soon as we found it.

Run `claude update` to make sure you're on the latest version.
trq_
·7 か月前·議論
Hi, work on Claude Code here! Let me know if you have any feedback!
trq_
·8 か月前·議論
We're back up! It was about ~30 minutes of downtime this morning, our apologies if it interrupted your work.
trq_
·2 年前·議論
Hmm the hallucination would happen in the auto labelling, but we review and test our labels and they seem correct!
trq_
·2 年前·議論
If you're hacking on this and have questions, please join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/vhT9Chrt
trq_
·2 年前·議論
We haven't yet found generalizable "make this model smarter" features, but there is a tradeoff of putting instructions in system prompts, e.g. if you have a chatbot that sometimes generates code, you can give it very specific instructions when it's coding and leave those out of the system prompt otherwise.

We have a notebook about that here: https://docs.goodfire.ai/notebooks/dynamicprompts
trq_
·2 年前·議論
This is incredible! I haven't seen that repo yet, thank you for pointing it out, and the writing
trq_
·2 年前·議論
Yeah, I think the idea of finding out what flavor of uncertainty you have is very interesting.
trq_
·2 年前·議論
This is awesome, can't wait for evals against Claude Computer Use!
trq_
·2 年前·議論
Yeah! I want to use the logprobs API, but you can't for example:

- sample multiple logits and branch (we maybe could with the old text completion API, but this no longer exists)

- add in a reasoning token on the fly

- stop execution, ask the user, etc.

But a visualization of logprobs in a query seems like it might be useful.
trq_
·2 年前·議論
I want to build intuition on this by building a logit visualizer for OpenAI outputs. But from what I've seen so far, you can often trace down a hallucination.

Here's an example of someone doing that for 9.9 > 9.11: https://x.com/mengk20/status/1849213929924513905
trq_
·2 年前·議論
I mean, LLMs certainly know representations of what words means and their relationship to each other, that's what the Key and Query matrices hold for example.

But in this case, it means that the underlying point in embedding space doesn't map clearly to only one specific token. That's not too different from when you have an idea in your head but can't think of the word.
trq_
·2 年前·議論
Yeah wouldn't be surprised if the big labs are doing more than just arg max in the sampling.
trq_
·2 年前·議論
Definitely, but if you can detect when you might be in one of those states, you could reflect to see exactly which state you're in.

So far this has mostly been done using Reinforcement Learning, but catching it and doing it inference seems like it could be interesting to explore. And much more approachable for open source, only the big ML labs can do this sort of RL.