HackerLangs
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

tvink

196 カルマ登録 4 年前

コメント

tvink
·13 時間前·議論
Idunno. I think you end up teaching them nothing and just doing it for them. I mentor plenty folks without learning more than basics of vscode/cursor, and the most important lesson for them is always how to figure out how to do stuff (which has never been easier than today).
tvink
·13 時間前·議論
I'm unsure why you point this out. It's also a non issue if you're trying to drive a unicycle. Isn't it more interesting to talk about the cases where it applies? Or do you reckon all programs should be microservices?
tvink
·30 日前·議論
There truly is not. Software engineering is not different in any meaningful way. Sure 30 years ago in waterfall land we were emulating the project management of engineering, with miserably expensive results. But it's all the same now. It's like differentiation between coding and programming, it's different in everyone's head.
tvink
·先月·議論
You don't think the rest of the world is doing funded research?
tvink
·先月·議論
Yeah this is copium. Everyone is sprinting to adopt everything that is useful, and it just haven't happened with MCP.

Also, what's the hold up? If they all are building one, presumably using AI, shouldn't they all be done already?
tvink
·2 か月前·議論
If it is verifiable, please show us. What if clear to you reeks delusion to me.
tvink
·3 か月前·議論
That is what too expensive to be an option for most.
tvink
·3 か月前·議論
You're on to something. It's the lisp machine of it all. Hot reloading is nothing that requires anything special, so you can redefine a callback or dependency with ease in the repl and the system chugs along. You can theoretically do something similar in ruby, but it's the opposite of elegant, you'd be forced to re implement methods with different dependencies etc. It's also a function of being "functional" in the lisp sense, that things are lists, and lists can be replaced, functions or otherwise.

The fun way to get a feel for lisp machines is emacs, it's so easy to fall of a language and especially hand-coding in a language if you don't have to.
tvink
·4 か月前·議論
Looks cool, but the phrase 'build applications with the flexibility and power of go' made me chuckle. Least damn flexible language in this whole space.
tvink
·4 か月前·議論
You're not wrong, for sufficient simple cases it's at a disadvantage. But once things get complicated, it wins by being the only thing that you can get to work without going insane.

And yeah, any serious use completely assumes a Max sub.
tvink
·4 か月前·議論
You'll be back :)
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
Honestly if we could have we would have, we can't even tax the people destroying our world, how are we going to create utopia
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
It's definitely an approach. I do think in true democratization of the internet, teaching people some tech is inevitable. We just can't have equal access if we retain the classes of user and maker as completely distinct.
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
This is the complete opposite of my experience.
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
The point of MCP is discoverability. A crud app is better, except you have to waste context telling your LLM a bunch of details. With MCP you only put into it's context what the circumstances are where it applies, and it can just invoke it. You could write a bunch of little wrapper scripts around each api you want to use and have basically reinvented MCP for yourself.
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
If only you could reach out of your own experience and ponder what might cause otherwise reasonable people to do so. Young people peer pressure, current marketing landscape, you're forced there if you want to make money as a creative, so many reasons. Great, you can live your life without. Can you live your life without assuming everyone has the privilege of your situation?
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
https://www.wheresyoured.at/costs/

Their AWS spend being higher than their revenue might hint at the same.

Nobody has reliable data, I think it's fair to assume that even Anthropic is doing voodoo math to sleep at night.
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
For sure not
tvink
·5 か月前·議論
Sure you can say consumers refusing the ad-ridden paywalled experience killed it, or we could say the lack of adaptation and finding better business models did. I think a lot of players killed themselves off fighting to preserve rather than adapt, or worse have digital content subsidize analog (to this day I keep running into ebooks that cost more than the physical books, and they wonder why people pirate)
tvink
·6 か月前·議論
utilitarianism is when you add up the suffering. stalin made number go up, mother teresa made number go down. these are also not the only options.