HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

tyler569

no profile record

コメント

tyler569
·2 年前·議論
Without being a domain expert, my intuition would be that PCIe is optimized for throughput over latency and there's probably a throughput compromise when you want low-latency access.
tyler569
·2 年前·議論
The best part about using nuclear for fuel generation is that you get to sidestep the biggest problem with nuclear - when you build a power plant you want to build it near people (who may object on safety grounds), but you can build a DAC fuel generator way out in the middle of nowhere.

Even better, you could build your nuclear DAC fuel generator in an old natural gas field, where there's ready-made transportation infrastructure for your product to where it's needed!
tyler569
·3 年前·議論
This sounds to me like someone put in real UV fluorescent tubes instead of blacklight tubes, those things are dangerous.
tyler569
·3 年前·議論
And that ABI specific stack manipulation would be UB, so the optimizer can assume it doesn't happen. With no UB, that's not true.
tyler569
·3 年前·議論
The accepted proposal does address and preserve `auto`'s use as a storage class, so `auto x = foo(y);` means type deduction based on the return type of `foo`, and `auto int x = 10;` declares an integer with automatic storage duration.