This seems like a very obvious case. If the government wants the data, it needs to come and copy it, possibly seize the hard drives, or if it doesn't want to do any of that but still access the data, it needs to pay the bills.
I don't think the EFFs claim here is actually of any legal merit. You have no legal right to access data you sent to a third-party at at any time, why would you even think that? Theres no "lex cloud" yet.
Really? Are there no actual programmers out there anymore?
Is this the future? Kids with huge inflated egos, showing off their "look how fast my (RAM|Network) is" micro-benchmarks and spouting off FUD on twitter.
Eh, I think you have no clue what the actual customer wants. The problems of the average computer user are probably more of the "I don't want to get robbed from this scareware" kind.
Right. Simple deflate will compress these 30 pictures down so that you can send them in an 'instant' over 3G as the article says. No. That's not how it works.
Either they created more bandwidth where there is none or this is really an announcement how their app can now do uploads in parallel. Woohoo! You finished the tutorial level, you may continue.
So what you're saying is that you should save the 10$ from the 15$ you pay for a Cortex and instead spend many many days to end up with a outlandishly slow solution?
I take it this is supposed to inspect network traffic, at some point you need some raw throughput.
You can claim your DUI was a mistake, a blunder, an oversight on your part, but that won't save you from a conviction. There apparently seem to be no such consequences when the government decides to shut down and possibly kill a business by suspending the domain.
They have ruined security for everyone by allowing government agencies (they didn't even bother to setup a front) and other questionable entities on that list. The correct response is not to send out a nice letter asking everyone to please give up crucial business information, but to kick everyone off that list and start over.
I don't think the EFFs claim here is actually of any legal merit. You have no legal right to access data you sent to a third-party at at any time, why would you even think that? Theres no "lex cloud" yet.