HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

varjag

16,006 カルマ登録 17 年前
http://funcall.org

投稿

The fall of the theorem economy

davidbessis.substack.com
285 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·9 日前·122 コメント

Human Bottlenecks

borretti.me
5 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·2 か月前·0 コメント

Mine, an IDE for Coalton and Common Lisp

coalton-lang.github.io
138 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·3 か月前·56 コメント

Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL

atgreen.github.io
134 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·4 か月前·18 コメント

A Preview of Coalton 0.2

coalton-lang.github.io
50 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·4 か月前·2 コメント

Cl-kawa: Scheme on Java on Common Lisp

github.com
90 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·5 か月前·24 コメント

PCB Rework and Repair Guide [pdf]

intertronics.co.uk
168 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·5 か月前·48 コメント

Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
4 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·5 か月前·0 コメント

Letting Claude play text adventures

borretti.me
154 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·6 か月前·62 コメント

There Is No New Aesthetics

borretti.me
4 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·6 か月前·0 コメント

Vintage Computing Christmas Challenge

logiker.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·7 か月前·0 コメント

Paged Out

pagedout.institute
599 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·7 か月前·64 コメント

Mizar Language

mizar.uwb.edu.pl
4 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·8 か月前·4 コメント

Tetris Effect

en.wikipedia.org
4 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·8 か月前·0 コメント

Vibecoding a Cyberpunk 3D GUI for System Commissioning

blog.funcall.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·9 か月前·0 コメント

Unit Testing in Coders at Work

gigamonkeys.wordpress.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 varjag·10 か月前·1 コメント

コメント

varjag
·11 時間前·議論
Let me simplify it for the sake of argument. Imagine I am unable to follow a middle school proof of Pythagoras. How does it matter if I trust anyone beyond that? What possible contribution can I build on top of that?
varjag
·11 時間前·議論
You can literally see the analog video links in countless thousands of published recordings. Nobody really does the hopping with analog video.
varjag
·11 時間前·議論
How come? It plainly negates the "easy" part. It's not easy at all, you need to scale your signal path to the magnitude of power. I.e. the expensive part.
varjag
·11 時間前·議論
FPV drones in the Russian war are generally pretty dumb devices, there's usually no frequency hopping involved to begin with. They have a lot more in common with baby monitors than with modern military comms.
varjag
·11 時間前·議論
Well we're literally discussing a human readable machine generated proof here yet you don't seem happy with that.
varjag
·11 時間前·議論
I didn't say they have no value. Just limited value. A novel readable proof that expands the horizons of human insight is certainly more valuable than a megabyte sized trychnobezoar of machine generated predicates.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
Yes. That makes it fat, expensive and vulnerable target. There are videos of them being blown up regularly.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
How does it matter if it Lean verified or a human verified proof if you comprehend neither?

There can't be too many people working in that corner of graph theory, and I expect the result to them being eminently straightforward.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
Human unreadable proofs have only limited value.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
It's not a long proof (it's not in Lean after all) so easy enough to comb through for a domain expert.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
Jamming broadband is a lot more energy expense than frequency hopping. Orders of magnitude.
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
You could try solving that in Lean perhaps
varjag
·12 時間前·議論
…and thank God it's not Lean.
varjag
·3 日前·議論
What happens in countries with no rule of law is rule of power hierarchies. A regional party boss would have his trusted deputes running things, who have their underlings, they underlings have their preferred business partners (police chiefs, businessmen, prosecutors, control authorities) and so on. A bribe at any level is always redistributed upwards.

Sometimes the big guy falls out of favor with bigger guys, and then the whole structure is up for grabs. The whole vertical is massacred (sometimes literally) while new people take over from the top down. Often what's visible happens a few degrees removed from the actual cause.

There's understanding among the ruling class and much of the populace that it's just How Things are Done. But moments like that give you public trials with executions that make some naïve Westerners clap.
varjag
·4 日前·議論
What did you use for the simulation part?
varjag
·6 日前·議論
I have in fact masters in SE and three decades experience of commercial programming. Loved every minute of it (well except the burnout episode) and still do my hobby projects. So I would say no, you are wrong. The models decimate not just the coding (the best and the most fun part of development) but all the pseudo-engineering roles like architects or product managers too. Simply because there's less need for communication in the team as the surface of work for each dev is now quite enormous.
varjag
·6 日前·議論
It's fine for your pet projects. But for most of professional programming it's no longer feasible as you'll be at a small fraction of your machine assisted performance.
varjag
·9 日前·議論
You know how I read new papers back in 1994? By going to the library, finding one in bi-annual publication list and requesting it through the University system. And it better be necessary because the uni had to pay both the catalogue and each reprint of an article. The access is most certainly easier today.
varjag
·9 日前·議論
Engineering is used fairly loosely these days but I insist engineering ends where you have to prove theorems.
varjag
·10 日前·議論
Normally export controls once introduced last years to decades.