warrenpj·6 年前·議論How can we know if something has yet to be explained, or is in fact inexplicable? Obviously, we can't.To declare that something is inexplicable is equivalent to saying it's supernatural.Naturalism is the philosophy that everything is ultimately governed by physical laws and is therefore explicable.
warrenpj·6 年前·議論Quoting Wikipedia:>In Buddhism, the term anattā (Pali) or anātman (Sanskrit) refers to the doctrine of "non-self", that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in phenomena.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatta
warrenpj·6 年前·議論I don't see the distinction.The context is>computers are not people or jewsJews are a subset of people.
warrenpj·6 年前·議論My understanding is that young people are at lower risk of severe symptoms, but they can still get infected and transmit the virus to others.
warrenpj·7 年前·議論I read the privacy policy before using it. I guess it doesn't upload anything. Is it naive to trust the privacy policy stated here? https://github.com/noahlevenson/stealing-ur-feelings/blob/ma...> The information is processed locally in your browser and is never transmitted or stored externally.
To declare that something is inexplicable is equivalent to saying it's supernatural.
Naturalism is the philosophy that everything is ultimately governed by physical laws and is therefore explicable.