HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

waterthrowaway

no profile record

投稿

Federal government suspends research funding to UCLA

dailybruin.com
4 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·12 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

17 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·0 コメント

Live from NASA GISS, kicking-off the Weather and Climate 100-hour livestream

youtube.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·0 コメント

National Snow and Ice Data Center changes service level to key sea ice datasets

nsidc.org
5 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·1 コメント

'Cruel and thoughtless': Trump fires hundreds at US climate agency Noaa

theguardian.com
30 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·2 コメント

U.S. to pull delegation from UN climate science meeting (IPCC)

axios.com
8 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·1 コメント

What are teleconnections? Connecting climate via global information highways

climate.gov
1 ポイント·投稿者 waterthrowaway·昨年·1 コメント

コメント

waterthrowaway
·28 日前·議論
As a physical oceanographer, the destruction of these observing systems is horrific.

It is hard to stress enough how intentionally OMB is trying to disassemble American science. The new (proposed) OMB guidelines prohibit international collaboration without pre approval for example. They also codify a political grant approval process. https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/the-office-of-manage...

Additionally, OMB is not releasing the congressional appropriated funds that they are required to. This is currently tanking the post-doctoral researcher market and eventually will wipe out a generation of researchers if it isn’t stopped. https://grant-witness.us/funding_curves_nsf.html

Please call your elected representatives! It is so so important! https://5calls.org/issue/federal-financial-assistance-scienc...
waterthrowaway
·9 か月前·議論
I would be curious if you have any source for this. I spent about 30 minutes looking through google scholar looking for studies from the 1980s which included snow projections under climate change to no avail.

I even got an account to a british newspaper database website [1] to try to find popular discussion of this claim. I was unable to find anything in maybe 10 minutes of looking.

[1] https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/search/results/198...

EDIT: I will also drop this citation for the general question of whether change is happening slower than previously predicted https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/201...
waterthrowaway
·12 か月前·議論
see also: https://www.science.org/content/article/nsf-and-nih-suspend-...

These grants make up about 75-80% of all NSF grants
waterthrowaway
·昨年·議論
KDE+arch works perfectly out of the box
waterthrowaway
·昨年·議論
This is really cool! Thank you for submitting it!

It is worth noting this is for the purpose of video games or visual effects not for scientific/operational simulations of the ocean.

Daily operational wave forecasts are available from NOAA's WaveWatch3 model here https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/wavewatch/ . These data products are wildly used by a variety of services including surf forecasts.

NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory also publishes nice graphics of the WaveWatch3 forecast for the great lakes https://www.glerl.noaa.gov/emf/waves/WW3/

EDIT: So many interesting scales of wave research too!

Here is a very small scale study: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/201...
waterthrowaway
·昨年·議論
Rossby waves are fascinating waves in the earth's climate system that are not due to gravity like surface water waves but rather the rotation of the earth. They play a very important role in weather and climate.
waterthrowaway
·昨年·議論
In the field of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics it is an important distinction as there are other very important waves. Rossby waves are not gravity waves and extremely important to the global climate (see their role in ENSO dynamics). Compressive waves (acoustic waves) are everywhere of course. There are also topographic Rossby waves, internal waves and Kelvin waves (note: kelvin waves and internal waves are gravity waves as well). Oh, and inertial waves!
waterthrowaway
·2 年前·議論
In this case it seems ocean heat content is a depth integrated measure (see page 11 of this document I found by following links in the above article https://upper-ocean-dynamics.earth.miami.edu/_assets/pdf/atb...). Seems like that OHC measure uses some reanalysis model but surface temperatures can be measured by satellite, and temperatures below can be measured from moorings in the Gulf (https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml) and argo floats currently in the region (https://argo.ucsd.edu/about/status/). I would expect them to all show similar trends.