HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

weedhopper

no profile record

投稿

RustSec bug reports result in claims of harassment, ban

theregister.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 weedhopper·4 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

weedhopper
·3 か月前·議論
But it’s written in Rust!!! It’s great!
weedhopper
·3 か月前·議論
[flagged]
weedhopper
·3 か月前·議論
The amount of ~skepticism~ hate is astounding here!! People don’t even acknowledge that it’s written in RUST!!!!
weedhopper
·3 か月前·議論
Rust! it’s written in rust and not javascript!!!!
weedhopper
·3 か月前·議論
I’ve recently been looking into some tools that provide quick or painless help like pop up snippets with descriptions and cheat sheets, got any recommendations?
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
None of this is an issue, the real issue is webpages not working in safari due to large part of the web being made exclusively for chromium.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Interesting, I wouldn’t think it matters that much though. If the phrase eating dogfood is unappetising to some when why not use the champagne analogy.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
I doubt this is about the asterisks at this point. It’s about Rust, rewriting working tools in Rust and showing that Rust is the way and the only way.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Must’ve been hard not to name it rusdo because Rust has to come first (before any logic).
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Exactly, too many times have i heard from some snob not to rub them, who later had to pull a splinter out of their finger.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
As shown by Altman, not really.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Exactly, paying for quality content should be normalised. Even a trivial amount - 10-50c. And the reality is that it is unheard of.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Awesome it’s hosted on codeberg too
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
There is a growing view of “healthy” approach to AI: Llm-assisted coding instead of vibing, using it for grammar and better language instead of letting it write the whole paper, starting off and getting a template instead of end to end AI.

Having AI write the homework/report/paper is considered plagiarism. It’s really easy to profs to check it because people who do it usually don’t even bother reading their own slop. It’s obvious nonsense and they can’t answer a basic question about their own work.

With coding it’s obviously harder, but the same works - asking “what does this part of code do” is very effective.

With the last part the real problem is lazy profs. Most don’t want to be bothered with ever talking to students, checking assignments, tutoring. If they could some of them would only do final exams.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
One seems to be completely empty and the remaining two seem to just be ideas for pro-ai and anti-ai respectively?
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
What’s so different about it besides the invite-only model?
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Looks like he never had any idea what he was doing in the first place. Vibe bro classic.
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Reads like Onion news (Zwiebel News?)
weedhopper
·4 か月前·議論
Speedtest has always seemed incredibly sketchy to me, i don’t know if others share this sentiment. https://fast.com completed the test faster than speedtest loads the site
weedhopper
·5 か月前·議論
Great post. I even wouldn’t mind more details, especially about datadog, or as others pointed out, the kind of contradiction with aws support.