HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

wek

no profile record

投稿

Position: Coding Benchmarks Are Misaligned with Agentic Software Engineering

arxiv.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·14 日前·0 コメント

Configuring Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study

arxiv.org
3 ポイント·投稿者 wek·先月·0 コメント

Building the harness around our coding agents. Eight failure modes and pillars

nimbalyst.com
3 ポイント·投稿者 wek·2 か月前·0 コメント

Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Back End Code Generation

arxiv.org
287 ポイント·投稿者 wek·2 か月前·197 コメント

Show HN: Nimbalyst open source Obsidian, Codex app, and Linear for coding agents

github.com
7 ポイント·投稿者 wek·2 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 wek·2 か月前·0 コメント

Agyn: A Multi-Agent System for Team-Based Autonomous Software Engineering

arxiv.org
2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·3 か月前·0 コメント

The Code Agent Orchestra: what makes multi-agent coding work

addyosmani.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·3 か月前·1 コメント

Managing context in long-run agentic applications

slack.engineering
2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·3 か月前·0 コメント

Jetbrain's Research: Understanding AI's Impact on Developer Workflows

blog.jetbrains.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 wek·3 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 wek·3 か月前·0 コメント

Speed at the cost of quality: Study of use of Cursor AI in open source projects (2025)

arxiv.org
148 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·81 コメント

Ask HN: How is your team collaborating while working with coding agents?

3 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·3 コメント

AI is an enchantment, not a level booster

2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·0 コメント

One plan/spec to rule them all (at least replace lots of docs)

3 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·0 コメント

Workflow to build context for coding agents

3 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·0 コメント

Things I keep reminding myself about while working with AI Agents

2 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·1 コメント

Comprehensive Benchmarking of Agentic Systems Across 104 Real-World Challenges

arxiv.org
1 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 wek·4 か月前·0 コメント

Local WYSIWYG Markdown, mockup, data model editor powered by Claude Code

nimbalyst.com
29 ポイント·投稿者 wek·7 か月前·5 コメント

コメント

wek
·12 日前·議論
[dead]
wek
·2 か月前·議論
[flagged]
wek
·2 か月前·議論
The article is correct to emphasize the importance of definition and that this can be a bottleneck. But it is incorrect to show the layered documentation and development lines taking just as long as they did pre-coding-agents.

Our team is coding much much faster at high quality then we were before coding agents. As this commenter says, if you empower individuals and small teams to define, document and they set up good practices and harnesses, they can accelerate dramatically.
wek
·2 か月前·議論
Well said. It is so much better for when the human can see what the LLM has changed and iterate on it with the LLM, making their own changes. Markdown is better for that.
wek
·2 か月前·議論
I kind of felt the same way reading the article! It felt so unusual to encounter someone who is both smart and humble and willing to admit they were learning. And I was happy to encounter it and sad that I was so surprised by it.
wek
·2 か月前·議論
Congratulations! I think that a lot of the value will be in the judgement of the maintainer about the marginal next feature (and saying no to all those other features) ... if software is a stream then the value is in what gets into the stream. That is an AI resistant value and if you can provide it for your project.
wek
·2 か月前·議論
What an excellent article by a smart, humble, still-learning person!

Favorite quote:" There are a whole bunch of reasons I’m not scared that my career as a software engineer is over now that computers can write their own code, partly because these things are amplifiers of existing experience. If you know what you’re doing, you can run so much faster with them. [...]

I’m constantly reminded as I work with these tools how hard the thing that we do is. Producing software is a ferociously difficult thing to do. And you could give me all of the AI tools in the world and what we’re trying to achieve here is still really difficult. [...]"
wek
·2 か月前·議論
And as of today Nimbalyst is open source!
wek
·2 か月前·議論
This is on our wish list for a custom extension. Many users have asked for it. If someone in the community wants to take a crack at it....
wek
·2 か月前·議論
Thanks! A good way to learn the platform is by building an extension.
wek
·3 か月前·議論
I use Nano Banana all the time and this seems like a step up
wek
·3 か月前·議論
I agree. Why would they not keep the $20 plan as a gateway drug?
wek
·3 か月前·議論
What are the implications of this for Cursor being model agnostic?
wek
·3 か月前·議論
Consider Nimbalyst, its a free visual workspace for Claude Code and Codex that has visual editing of markdown, mockups, diagrams, code with your agents with WYSYWIG diffs as well as task management and kanban session management tied into your agents. Its got a files/plan/editing mode and an agent/sessions mode.
wek
·3 か月前·議論
this is true of AI in general
wek
·3 か月前·議論
so cool. This whole mission makes me feel like a kid again.
wek
·3 か月前·議論
This is cool. Simple prototype. Is it dependent on lighting ... what if you are outside or backlit or glare etc...?
wek
·3 か月前·議論
Amaze. Amaze. Thank you for sharing.
wek
·4 か月前·議論
I'm concerned about these laws and their implications for privacy, but as a parent, I'm not sure what you mean to say parents should parent. How? What should the parent do? How would you recommend a parent protect a 13 year old who spends their time in their room and out with their friends on their phones?
wek
·4 か月前·議論
Thanks for sharing. I appreciated getting different perspectives. I come down on ultimately this is lying and I don't see how lying to oneself is going to be helpful.