HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

xqli

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·2 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·3 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Xpandas – running Pandas-style computation directly in pure C++

6 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·4 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: Mneme–Persistent memory for AI agents without vector search or RAG

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·5 か月前·4 コメント

Show HN: Sbox – A zero-dependency sandbox to safely run untrusted code

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·5 か月前·1 コメント

Show HN: Sbox – zero intelligence, pure isolation sandbox

github.com
2 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·5 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 xqli·5 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

xqli
·5 か月前·議論
That matches our experience pretty closely. A lot of “memory” issues we saw weren’t about storage capacity, but about what kind of information is allowed to persist and how it’s structured. Once everything is flattened into one blob, retrieval strategy becomes the only lever left — which is where vectors often get overused.

In Mneme, updates are intentionally asymmetric: – Facts are append-only and explicitly curated (they’re meant to be boring and stable). – Task state is rewritten as work progresses. – Context is disposable and aggressively compacted or dropped.

The idea is that only a small subset of information deserves long-term durability; everything else should be easy to overwrite or forget.

This reduces the need for heavy retrieval logic in the first place, since the model is usually operating over a much smaller, more explicit working set.
xqli
·5 か月前·議論
Mneme came out of long-running AI coding sessions where important state kept getting lost due to context compaction.

Instead of retrieval or embeddings, it treats memory as an explicit, structured artifact and separates: – stable facts – task state – ephemeral context

The goal is to make memory boring, inspectable, and durable across sessions.

Happy to answer questions or hear why this is a bad idea
xqli
·5 か月前·議論
Hi HN, I built Sbox because I needed a way to run untrusted / agent-generated code without adding policy logic, scoring, or heuristics.

Sbox is intentionally "zero intelligence": - no code analysis - no allow/deny rules - no LLM involvement

It only provides strong isolation primitives, and assumes all code is hostile.

I’m using it as a building block for long-running agents and automation systems. Would love feedback from people who’ve built sandboxes or secure runtimes.
xqli
·5 か月前·議論
Guys, any suggestions?
xqli
·5 か月前·議論
no, python is all my need^_^
xqli
·5 か月前·議論
[dead]