HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

yamarldfst

no profile record

投稿

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 yamarldfst·30 日前·0 コメント

Ask HN: Agentic search vs. RAG – what's your production experience?

1 ポイント·投稿者 yamarldfst·5 か月前·1 コメント

[untitled]

1 ポイント·投稿者 yamarldfst·5 か月前·0 コメント

[untitled]

2 ポイント·投稿者 yamarldfst·5 か月前·0 コメント

Show HN: AgentDX – Open-source linter and LLM benchmark for MCP servers

github.com
1 ポイント·投稿者 yamarldfst·5 か月前·0 コメント

コメント

yamarldfst
·4 か月前·議論
The framing of "constraints over instructions" at Level 6 is the most underrated point here. In my experience, the reliability jump from telling an LLM "always output valid JSON" vs. giving it a typed schema with static validation is night and day — especially with smaller models. I'd argue that levels 3-5 deserve more weight than the post gives them. The gap between someone who has internalized context engineering and someone who hasn't is larger than the gap between levels 7 and 8. Most failures I see in agentic systems aren't from insufficient autonomy — they're from poorly structured prompts and tool descriptions that compound errors downstream. The foundation work is less glamorous but it's where the leverage is.The "decouple the implementer from the reviewer" principle is spot on. Same model reviewing its own output is basically asking someone to proofread their own essay.
yamarldfst
·4 か月前·議論
what is the meaning of this!??
yamarldfst
·4 か月前·議論
interested, keep us posted!