HackerTrans
トップ新着トレンドコメント過去質問紹介求人

yzmtf2008

no profile record

投稿

FAA to use "machine learning and language modeling" to scan incident reports

faa.gov
5 ポイント·投稿者 yzmtf2008·昨年·0 コメント

コメント

yzmtf2008
·24 日前·議論
I thought really hard about coming up with an actual response, but no, you don’t deserve one.

Gee, the aviation world would be so much safer if everyone just listened to pixl97.
yzmtf2008
·昨年·議論
Garmin's GI-275: https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/719027

This one 3-1/8" inch instrument displays more than 15 pieces of information, is somehow perfectly legible even in turbulent flight, _and_ is more reliable and accurate than a whole 6-pack[1]. Synthetic vision unlock is only $500. This is all without switching different pages.

Get two of them, and the FAA considers the possiblities of both of them failing at the same time so low, that you can cover one of them to satisfy partial panel failures in a checkride - well, all you do is to switch the "working" one to the PFD page, and you haven't really lost any capabilities!

[1]: https://pilotinstitute.com/six-pack-instruments/
yzmtf2008
·2 年前·議論
> The first batch of very high performance RISC-V chips are dropping soon, and there will be servers, as well as Android devices.

Is this the new "2024 is the year of linux desktops"?
yzmtf2008
·2 年前·議論
As always, when running time series predictions on financial datasets, one need to use daily return (including dividends, corporate actions, etc.) rather than end of day price.

Simply outputting the last value (as more or less shown in these charts) is a pretty good end of day price predictor!
yzmtf2008
·6 年前·議論
Is it really cherry-picked? Or if it is, is it really that difficult to pick out the "cherries"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherton_station
yzmtf2008
·6 年前·議論
Both Lyft and Uber are public companies. If you know this is a bubble for sure, there are plenty of opportunities for you to cash in on that. In fact, if you have solid research that proves it's a bubble, plenty of people will pay you for that research.
yzmtf2008
·6 年前·議論
Is forcing wheelchair users to use subway human decency to you? We're talking about a situation where it's cheaper to let them use taxi service, and it's a better experience.

My uncle lives in a wheelchair by the way. The horror of imagining him having to use the subway...
yzmtf2008
·6 年前·議論
> who wouldn't prefer a private air-conditioned taxi over 100 ˚F subway platforms?

When it's prohibitively expensive to take private air-conditioned taxi.

If taxi is, as you said, both cheaper and provides a better experience, why not? Are we torturing people just for your poetic justice?
yzmtf2008
·8 年前·議論
It's no more "by principle" secure than any other SQL server bind to localhost only, so I'm not sure what you meant by it does not suffer from a RCE.
yzmtf2008
·8 年前·議論
That’s not the point of GP though? The whole premise of virtualization is that an OS process is not a perfect sandbox. There’s a hierarchy of sandboxes. Protecting other processes from accessing something inside the sandbox is not the job of a browser sandbox. This actually just goes to show the GP’s point: not all sandboxes are created equal.
yzmtf2008
·8 年前·議論
I think you have the idea of sandbox (or at least the idea of sandbox in the context of a web browser) backwards: it means an application (webpage) running inside the sandbox cannot access resources not granted. This side channel access does not run inside a sandbox at all.