Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners?(eff.org)
eff.org
Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners?
https://www.eff.org/wp/which-internet-registries-offer-best-protection-domain-owners
23 comments
80211(2)
[deleted]
So in summary, .at and .is are the best in terms of not getting your domain taken by others.
.de and .ru seem to be similar in that regard.
Most of the others limit arbitration-related takedowns to trademarks. I would be wary of those which allow broader takedowns.
.at hides personal info. .is seems to make name and email public. .de seems to make name and mailing address public. .ru has "normal" whois.
As a Canadian, I'm not at risk for a Canadian trademark takedown and individuals have their Whois data hidden so I prefer .ca to .com/.net/.org
Most of the others limit arbitration-related takedowns to trademarks. I would be wary of those which allow broader takedowns.
.at hides personal info. .is seems to make name and email public. .de seems to make name and mailing address public. .ru has "normal" whois.
As a Canadian, I'm not at risk for a Canadian trademark takedown and individuals have their Whois data hidden so I prefer .ca to .com/.net/.org
I was quite surprised by the statement of the EFF that .at allows hiding of personal info (unless a trustee is used). My impression, from personal experience, is that this is not the case. The NIC-AT WHOIS policy also seems to indicate that the WHOIS data will be public [1].
[1] https://www.nic.at/en/my-at-domain/domain-search/whois-polic...
[1] https://www.nic.at/en/my-at-domain/domain-search/whois-polic...
One would generally hope that one's own country is suitable. It doesn't always work out in the modern world, of course.
ARIN
Ok, so if I wanted to register a name, that NO one could touch, who would I go with?
Love to say to a lawyer, OK, how is you Azerbaijan? You'll have to deal with them.
Love to say to a lawyer, OK, how is you Azerbaijan? You'll have to deal with them.
I can't help but chuckle that the most secure and censorship resistant domain is the .onion domain.
Well it is literally designed for that. Only downside is that you have to be on the network (TOR) to begin with.
There's the automatic http://[whatever].onion.to gateway
Though I suppose that doesn't help with things like email.
Though I suppose that doesn't help with things like email.
[deleted]
Didn't mention OpenNIC tho.
why? the overwhelming majority of internet users don't use alternate dns roots, so unless you want your users to switch their dns settings on all their devices to use your site, no serious sites are going to use it. at least .onion has some use in that it's the only way of addressing hidden services.
If you want to protect your identity but still use a regular TLD you can register the domain thru Njalla, https://njal.la/
Well, there are ccTLD registries that do not allow protecting or hiding the owner's identity. The FAQ on Njalla doesn't clarify how this works legally and if certain authorities could shut down domains when they find that the owner in the WHOIS is just a proxy for the real one. The best option, IMO, would be to use TLDs that allow such protection to be used.
Njalla does clarify: they are the owners of the domain, therefore they only have to display their identity.
When you purchase a domain name through Njalla, we own it for you. However, the agreement between us grants you full usage rights to the domain. Whenever you want to, you can transfer the ownership to yourself or some other party.
When you purchase a domain name through Njalla, we own it for you. However, the agreement between us grants you full usage rights to the domain. Whenever you want to, you can transfer the ownership to yourself or some other party.
Quite many registries forbid this and explicitly forbids the registrar to hold domains for their customers. Those that disregard this can lose their registrar status.
It is sadly also common to see ccTLD that require that the legal owner have local presence in the country of the TLD. The way to go around this is to have a legal entity, often a law firm, which then holds the domain. If Njalla uses this, then you the customer don't have ownership, and Njalla do not either, but rather its the law firm.
It is sadly also common to see ccTLD that require that the legal owner have local presence in the country of the TLD. The way to go around this is to have a legal entity, often a law firm, which then holds the domain. If Njalla uses this, then you the customer don't have ownership, and Njalla do not either, but rather its the law firm.
Quite many registries forbid this and explicitly forbids the registrar to hold domains for their customers. Those that disregard this can lose their registrar status.
Right, which is why they say "we're not actually a domain name registration service, we're a customer to these. We sit in between the domain name registration service and you".
Right, which is why they say "we're not actually a domain name registration service, we're a customer to these. We sit in between the domain name registration service and you".
> It is sadly also common to see...
Why is this sad?
Why is this sad?
Because it doesn’t work. The intention if the ccTLD registry is clear: they only want local businesses and persons to use the domain names in their ccTLD. But as it stands, as a foreign company it is only slightly more expensive to register a domain in such a ccTLD than some other TLD – it does not stop anyone except poorer foreign people from registering, and placing limits on poor people just for being poor never works out well.