Cisco Systems pulled out of Russia: destroyed $23.42M worth of equipment(gagadget.com)
gagadget.com
Cisco Systems pulled out of Russia: destroyed $23.42M worth of equipment
https://gagadget.com/en/232400-cisco-systems-pulled-out-of-russia-and-destroyed-2342m-worth-of-equipment/
73 comments
No.
Cisco IOS/IOS-XE routers and switches will complain that you haven't licensed them correctly, but it doesn't impact functionality.
Cisco shot both it's feet years ago with an unpopular "SMART Licensing" scheme. One of my proudest moments as a net tech was the shocked silence when I told a room of Cisco employees that we weren't upgrading our 3850s past 16.6 (or something) because we refused to deal with their SMART licensing. They came up with a solution and we ended up upgrading (there was a feature in a later version that we wanted).
In the past, there were different software images for different feature sets. If you could get ahold of an image you didn't pay for, it would just work and you'd have functionality that wasn't licensed.
In the really distant past, this worked but not well because you'd need specialized hardware for things like fast encryption for VPN. So, if you didn't pay for the securityk9 license and used the 2811 without a VPN module, it would work but not well.
Anyways, I'm not aware of Cisco having any ability to brick customer equipment. I read this article as saying they destroyed their own property in branches and warehouses within the Russian Federation.
Cisco IOS/IOS-XE routers and switches will complain that you haven't licensed them correctly, but it doesn't impact functionality.
Cisco shot both it's feet years ago with an unpopular "SMART Licensing" scheme. One of my proudest moments as a net tech was the shocked silence when I told a room of Cisco employees that we weren't upgrading our 3850s past 16.6 (or something) because we refused to deal with their SMART licensing. They came up with a solution and we ended up upgrading (there was a feature in a later version that we wanted).
In the past, there were different software images for different feature sets. If you could get ahold of an image you didn't pay for, it would just work and you'd have functionality that wasn't licensed.
In the really distant past, this worked but not well because you'd need specialized hardware for things like fast encryption for VPN. So, if you didn't pay for the securityk9 license and used the 2811 without a VPN module, it would work but not well.
Anyways, I'm not aware of Cisco having any ability to brick customer equipment. I read this article as saying they destroyed their own property in branches and warehouses within the Russian Federation.
You won’t have a solution for the monthly CVEs for Cisco’s firmware though.
You're right, but you might be disappointed in how seldom network operators actually install updates. It isn't uncommon to find switches with a year of uptime still running the factory software that came preinstalled. (I'm obviously not trying to defend this malpractice!)
Is cisco firmware piracy not a thing?
I get the feeling it's about to become one if it wasn't.
I get the feeling it's about to become one if it wasn't.
You can easily find firmwares for older EOL systems. Cisco isn't even gonna fight that. Readily available on the Bay of Yarrrrrrr
Newer firmwares for Cisco, Juniper, Brocade, et al, are a little harder but still easy to find.
In both cases caveat emptor, since you have no way of knowing if they're trustworthy or not. I messed around with some older yarrrrrr firmware when I was studying for my CCNP and built a lap from craigslist hardware, but that was behind a pfsense firewall I built myself and kept totally away from anything that mattered. No malicious behavior AFAIK, but I'd never trust those IOS/IOS-NX images in Prod.
Newer firmwares for Cisco, Juniper, Brocade, et al, are a little harder but still easy to find.
In both cases caveat emptor, since you have no way of knowing if they're trustworthy or not. I messed around with some older yarrrrrr firmware when I was studying for my CCNP and built a lap from craigslist hardware, but that was behind a pfsense firewall I built myself and kept totally away from anything that mattered. No malicious behavior AFAIK, but I'd never trust those IOS/IOS-NX images in Prod.
Well, Cisco publishes both MD5 and SHA-512 hashes for all their updates. It would be pretty impressive for a bad guy to build an evil file that has both an MD5 and also SHA-512 collision. You might need an active CCO account to view http://software.cisco.com, though.
[deleted]
[deleted]
But that's like saying if you don't pay your mortgage the bank isn't allowed to repossess your house. You think banks are going to keep providing mortgages?
The ability to remotely disable equipment is essential in order to allow for cheaper financing plans, to make sure customers don't steal stuff they haven't finished paying for, or that they've only been leasing.
Sure, you could pass a law prohibiting that. But then customers have to pay a whole lot more in financing/leasing because there's much more incentive to stop payment but keep the equipment, and repossessing the equipment gets messy. (You can move/hide a tractor or a router much more easily than you can move a house.)
The ability to remotely disable equipment is essential in order to allow for cheaper financing plans, to make sure customers don't steal stuff they haven't finished paying for, or that they've only been leasing.
Sure, you could pass a law prohibiting that. But then customers have to pay a whole lot more in financing/leasing because there's much more incentive to stop payment but keep the equipment, and repossessing the equipment gets messy. (You can move/hide a tractor or a router much more easily than you can move a house.)
Several times in my 20 year career I’ve seen startups get financing for equipment then turn around and not pay the bill. Makes perfect sense to add this kind of DRM for financing but we all know nation states will abuse it.
"Cisco Systems decided to physically destroy spare parts, product demonstrations, equipment and even furniture"
I don't think that answers the question. OP asked (probably) about hardware deployed on client premises, but running proprietary software requiring license (or perhaps subscription as the "renew" suggests?).
Not your production -- not your coins^W hardware. In peacetime, it doesn't matter too much, because nearly nothing can outweigh the reputation loss if there is a case of remote equipment sabotage. In wartime, however, all bets are off.
Not that I have any pity towards Russia, but, say, China can also do this in the case of war.
Not that I have any pity towards Russia, but, say, China can also do this in the case of war.
Yeah, we know. The US proactively banned Huawei gear to prevent the same rug from being pulled out from under us. Europe has Juniper.
Same with some foreign governments moving to private-label Linux variants to reduce reliance on [US-produced] Windows.
Next is TikTok, to eliminate foreign software with large domestic deployment.
Unless we backdoor Android/iOS, the US doesn't have too many more strings to pull.
Same with some foreign governments moving to private-label Linux variants to reduce reliance on [US-produced] Windows.
Next is TikTok, to eliminate foreign software with large domestic deployment.
Unless we backdoor Android/iOS, the US doesn't have too many more strings to pull.
[deleted]
> "By the end of 2022, Cisco Systems had reduced its workforce by a factor of 12 to five employees."
I think something got lost in translation here.
I think something got lost in translation here.
I read it as they originally had 60 employees. Odd wording.
I think they maybe mean 12x5, so from 60 to 5 but don't quote me on that.
I guess this is what happens when people take math word problems as a style guide.
So they destroyed three routers?
hheeeyyyyoooo!
Related: What's the current status of iOS and Android devices in Russia? Are they still getting updates?
They do
How? They're sanctioned
Payments to and from Russia are sanctioned, some banking/government services apps removed from the stores, but everything else works as before. And since Android allows 3rd party app stores, Russia has now its own app store where you can get everything what was banned due to sanctions.
Also as a software company you anyway don't want people massively using old versions of your product with publicly known security flaws.
"New large YourProduct botnet noticed by security researchers" is never a good publicity in media even if botnet consists of sanctioned users' devices.
This is very bizarre. All sanctions have carve-outs for exactly the Cisco products (so that customers can always safely get online!) Now it will all get replaced with Huawei products. How is this better?
Part of the point of sanctions is to reduce Russia's options, it's understood that some products will just get replaced by ones from outside the geopolitical "West".
Presumably they weren't already using those other options before because they were worse for some reason or another, and so it still hurts to have to switch. Plus, having fewer options may mean it's harder to negotiate a good deal.
Presumably they weren't already using those other options before because they were worse for some reason or another, and so it still hurts to have to switch. Plus, having fewer options may mean it's harder to negotiate a good deal.
That reason is all to commonly simple inertia.
Breaking the inertia on a whole bunch of geopolitical norms has been the largest result of all this mess.
Freezing foreign reserves and restricting access to international financial messaging systems etc is probably the biggest change to the status quo and the reverberations of that have set in motion huge changes.
The unilateral sanctions have been levied before, but usually only against "backwater" places that have no chance to fight back and thus most countries with a functional military and economy were never too scared of it.
Applying the same sort of doctrine against a functional (even if barely so) nation like Russia has set off alarm bells in every nation that doesn't identify as "Western". This is why you are seeing actual progress towards international trade being settled in non-USD currencies. The breaking of petrodollar and the shifting allegiance of OPEC away from the West after ~40 years of tenuous "cooperation" is also a big consequence of this.
It's very unclear waters ahead now. I'm not really sure breaking all these norms was worth it vs just sending traditional support and utilising traditional sanctions. If Russia was expelled from Ukraine within months of enacting it then I might have had a different view but now I'm sceptical this was a good idea.
Breaking the inertia on a whole bunch of geopolitical norms has been the largest result of all this mess.
Freezing foreign reserves and restricting access to international financial messaging systems etc is probably the biggest change to the status quo and the reverberations of that have set in motion huge changes.
The unilateral sanctions have been levied before, but usually only against "backwater" places that have no chance to fight back and thus most countries with a functional military and economy were never too scared of it.
Applying the same sort of doctrine against a functional (even if barely so) nation like Russia has set off alarm bells in every nation that doesn't identify as "Western". This is why you are seeing actual progress towards international trade being settled in non-USD currencies. The breaking of petrodollar and the shifting allegiance of OPEC away from the West after ~40 years of tenuous "cooperation" is also a big consequence of this.
It's very unclear waters ahead now. I'm not really sure breaking all these norms was worth it vs just sending traditional support and utilising traditional sanctions. If Russia was expelled from Ukraine within months of enacting it then I might have had a different view but now I'm sceptical this was a good idea.
CIA should've taken over ops of Cisco in Russia and put backdoors in all infrastructure routers. I'm surprised they didn't.
> CIA should've taken over ops of Cisco in Russia and put backdoors in all infrastructure routers
That was happening already.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cisco-backdoor-hardcoded-a...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608141/snowden--the-nsa-p...
That was happening already.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cisco-backdoor-hardcoded-a...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608141/snowden--the-nsa-p...
That would require the CIA to not already have backdoors in all Cisco equipment.
Whatever the reason was clearly it was a mistake.
A mistake to...sanction a country for invading their democratic neighbor for no other reason than imperial ambitions? A country that's kidnapping children en masse and flinging missiles at civilian targets while speedrunning their way to maximum war crimes?
No, it would've been wrong not to sanction Russia. The West's only mistake has been not sending arms to Ukraine even faster.
No, it would've been wrong not to sanction Russia. The West's only mistake has been not sending arms to Ukraine even faster.
The problem is, is that it is just not Russia. Other countries are starting to learn that they could be sanctioned or cut off. Not only that the assets of private citizens can be seized easily. Wars happen, conflicts happen after all something similar could have been said about the Middle East.
No. It was a mistake for Russia to use technology from the west and not China.
If they were going to try and conquer their neighbors, then yes.
Western countries and businesses were happy to sell to Russia indefinitely before they attacked Ukraine.
Western countries and businesses were happy to sell to Russia indefinitely before they attacked Ukraine.
kfkfofpspwp(1)
Until they are replaced they will not get updates, leaving them open for possible intrusions. Let them have Chinese equipment, starving them of western technology to reverse engineer, steal or sell to competitors isn’t a bad thing either.
I doubt they have a problem putting their hands on enough IP to reverse engineer, despite the sanctions.
Probably, but will they be able to reverse engineer and produce successfully?
Everything I've read about Russia indicates that, while they have plenty of smart engineers*, the business culture and civic society are so messed up that they have lots of problems actually making things in practice. Too much corruption and people trying to take advantage of each other.
* Well, maybe less now, since so many IT workers fled
Everything I've read about Russia indicates that, while they have plenty of smart engineers*, the business culture and civic society are so messed up that they have lots of problems actually making things in practice. Too much corruption and people trying to take advantage of each other.
* Well, maybe less now, since so many IT workers fled
But any problems there aren't an issue of sourcing units to reverse engineer. Practically, the sanctions won't function that way.
Sanctions might make production harder in other ways, limiting access to machines that make machines, for instance.
Fair point. I don't think we've thought through all the implications of this.
It's obviously bad when Western countries use Huawei products, but I don't immediately see why it's bad when Russia does.
Why not ship them or sell them over seas instead of destroying them ?
Because you're not getting that hardware out of Russia through normal channels.
In the best of times, in the best of places, you'd be able to do that. Decommission the hardware in use, pack it all up, ship it wherever.
It is not the best of times in Russia and it was never the best of places.
In the best of times while operating in an adversarial market (to put it diplomatically), you have to know you're doing this well in advance and slowly phase out the equipment. Some of it is likely physically installed in the locations. And you have to do this while essentially receiving no new equipment. Which you could do by just faking shipments and manifests. But you're effectively smuggling at this point.
Now, with everything going on. You have to worry about Russia just sort of claiming your hardware/business/people and daring you to come get it. You get your people out and torch everything you can on your way out.
In the best of times, in the best of places, you'd be able to do that. Decommission the hardware in use, pack it all up, ship it wherever.
It is not the best of times in Russia and it was never the best of places.
In the best of times while operating in an adversarial market (to put it diplomatically), you have to know you're doing this well in advance and slowly phase out the equipment. Some of it is likely physically installed in the locations. And you have to do this while essentially receiving no new equipment. Which you could do by just faking shipments and manifests. But you're effectively smuggling at this point.
Now, with everything going on. You have to worry about Russia just sort of claiming your hardware/business/people and daring you to come get it. You get your people out and torch everything you can on your way out.
That assumes that Russian officials would let the items leave.
Bingo! AFAIK Russia has banned the sale or expatriation of western assets out of Russia.
They probably had special NSA implants inside of them and didn't want it getting out. [1]
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
It'd be really impressive if the NSA could intercept shipment a router manufactured in Russia or China, and then re-insert the shipment into the supply chain.
Now I know why Cisco gear always takes forever to ship.
Tons of networking components contain microprocessors, microcontrollers and programmable logic with excess capacity for their role and could hide implants in software, firmware or even bitstreams without changing a single part of the hardware e.g. leaking encryption keys as jitter observable to a passive attacker, just waiting for backdoor command to e.g. drop or massively delay 90% of all traffic or even fry the hardware by overvolting or intentionally violating bus arbitration rules having multiple push-pull drivers active at the same time on a bus. You're only limited by the available time, physical access, hardware and the creativity of your paranoia. Should such implants exist it could be installed in a few minutes either through the whatever update process is supposed to patch the involved components or through, exposed test pads or even clipping suitable packages on the boards e.g. a serial flash chip. It's a scary paranoid idea.
There is no need to add imaginary Chinese spy chips to Supermicro mainboards the common AST2x000 BMC chips are already ideal spy chips by design and given the observed quality of the firmware e.g. there used to be an undocumented command available via the SSH management shell to drop into a root shell on the BMC and you could just download the plaintext password file required to log in via HTTP. While disclosing the password file via SSH is bad you can't even blame Supermicro for storing the plaintext passwords in the first place since IPMI BMCs have to store the plaintext passwords because they're required for the terrible challenge-response handshake mandated in the protocol which doesn't allow storing only a precomputed salted hash over the password. How many companies dispose of old servers without wiping the BMC passwords? How many of them reuse a single password over large parts of the server fleet? Some days I find it hard to attribute this to incompetence instead of malice. Now where have I left my tinfoil hat? sigh
There is no need to add imaginary Chinese spy chips to Supermicro mainboards the common AST2x000 BMC chips are already ideal spy chips by design and given the observed quality of the firmware e.g. there used to be an undocumented command available via the SSH management shell to drop into a root shell on the BMC and you could just download the plaintext password file required to log in via HTTP. While disclosing the password file via SSH is bad you can't even blame Supermicro for storing the plaintext passwords in the first place since IPMI BMCs have to store the plaintext passwords because they're required for the terrible challenge-response handshake mandated in the protocol which doesn't allow storing only a precomputed salted hash over the password. How many companies dispose of old servers without wiping the BMC passwords? How many of them reuse a single password over large parts of the server fleet? Some days I find it hard to attribute this to incompetence instead of malice. Now where have I left my tinfoil hat? sigh
> manufactured in Russia or China
> Servers, routers get “beacons” implanted at secret locations by NSA’s TAO team. (subtitle from the article in GP; emphasis mine)
Didn't make sense at first but now it does. Yeah, that would be impressive.
> Servers, routers get “beacons” implanted at secret locations by NSA’s TAO team. (subtitle from the article in GP; emphasis mine)
Didn't make sense at first but now it does. Yeah, that would be impressive.
A few things.
1- That involves added costs that you may or may not recoup (read sibling comment about Russia "not allowing it" which doesn't seem out of hand). So if you don't want it in the current State's hands, and you can't reliably export them, destruction might be the right choice. 2- Part of the goal may be the headline. Either good press for Cisco or bad press for Russia, but visibility can be a goal as well.
1- That involves added costs that you may or may not recoup (read sibling comment about Russia "not allowing it" which doesn't seem out of hand). So if you don't want it in the current State's hands, and you can't reliably export them, destruction might be the right choice. 2- Part of the goal may be the headline. Either good press for Cisco or bad press for Russia, but visibility can be a goal as well.
I like the idea of scorched earth when you are forced to leave because of outside circumstances (war, politics, etc.). Burn it down!
But for serious, likely too risky to have the potential for anything that can fall into a sanctioned country’s hands. Just destroy it and write it off.
But for serious, likely too risky to have the potential for anything that can fall into a sanctioned country’s hands. Just destroy it and write it off.
What a waste of rare earths, minerals and metals.
Knowing Cisco's prices, $23 M must be only like 10-20 network appliances lol.
Cuirously, Putin has been photographed with Video Conferencing gear similar to what Cisco sells, but from competitor Polycom ( now known as Poly, but made when it was Polycom )
I can't imagine this is anything more than a good opportunity to cut bait and get a good pres release on the write-off
I can't imagine this is anything more than a good opportunity to cut bait and get a good pres release on the write-off
The site is ostensibly in Ukraine. This may be propaganda. It might be disinformation.
Just FYI.
Just FYI.
The source is from a Russian source
https://tass.ru/ekonomika/17451425
https://tass.ru/ekonomika/17451425
So Russian sources are trustworthy now?
If they paint Russia in a bad light or admit negative impact, they're at least slightly more trustworthy than the other way around?
If you start believing only bad news about an adversary, they'll publish it themselves in order to mislead you and downplay their capabilities.
Just assume everything coming from them is propaganda and draw your own conclusions from sources that can't be puppeted by an enemy regime playing hardball psyops with social media for the last two decades.
Just assume everything coming from them is propaganda and draw your own conclusions from sources that can't be puppeted by an enemy regime playing hardball psyops with social media for the last two decades.
I guess we will wait until Cisco says the same thing ..... But Cisco is an American company . America is in NATO .I'm American too this website is also based on the US . We are all paid shills and you are the only real person here
[deleted]
[deleted]
Does the equipment stop working?
I don’t understand how any country in the world is using equipment that can be turned off by the manufacturer. Infrastructure, communications, farming, etc. should all be run with non-revocable licenses. Make it the law.