Ford reveals breakthrough process for lower priced EVs(theverge.com)
theverge.com
Ford reveals breakthrough process for lower priced EVs
https://www.theverge.com/ford-motor-company/757243/ford-ev-truck-breakthrough-model-t
18 comments
Sodium ion batteries already only use abundant minerals and no lithium. Already a production car made with this in china. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium-ion_battery
Sodium ion batteries have, at least currently, worse energy density than even LFP batteries. Also, current costs of sodium batteries are quite high. The latter will change over time of course, but energy density remains a problem. Nobody really wants a car that only goes 150mi, especially as their only car.
LFP batteries are made from cheap, widely available elements. Lithium is quite common in the Earth's crust, more common than some of the trace components of high grade steel, like molybdenum. And they use a lot less energy to refine than Aluminum does.
The battery in this new truck is worth less than $3000, today. I don't think Ford can build an engine and a transmission for under $3K. The difference will be even more stark in 2027.
Is this Fords first multi-chassis skateboard design? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboard_(automotive_platfor...
That article could definitely use some history and or dates. GM AUTOnomy (2002) for example feels like the first time I really recall seeing this design suggested. https://www.adrianchernoff.com/project/autonomy/
That article could definitely use some history and or dates. GM AUTOnomy (2002) for example feels like the first time I really recall seeing this design suggested. https://www.adrianchernoff.com/project/autonomy/
Is this different than what GM has been doing with Ultium?
Unfortunately, the trend seems to be that as manufacturability of a product increases, repairability decreases. A simple example is the heavy use of fragile, easily broken clips to hold on parts that used to be held on with bolts and screws.
/s the breakthrough: A basic car with that happens to have EV power train.
The anti-secret: EV power train that accelerated 0-60 in 1s and all the software engineering going into a software defined, internet connected autonomous vehicle with subscription services and such that balloon the costs of a modern vehicle?
The anti-secret: EV power train that accelerated 0-60 in 1s and all the software engineering going into a software defined, internet connected autonomous vehicle with subscription services and such that balloon the costs of a modern vehicle?
The silicon valley guy spent a ton of money on chairs and avocado toast and probably said hey let's just do what slate's doing
https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a64580484/slate-truck-ev-p...
https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a64580484/slate-truck-ev-p...
2025 version of the Chrysler K car…
> The next-gen “universal” EV platform is the product of Ford’s Silicon Valley-based skunkworks team helmed by Alan Clarke, executive director of advanced EV production and a 12-year veteran of Tesla.
Whatever happens to Tesla the company, its impact on the world's vehicles is indelible.
Whatever happens to Tesla the company, its impact on the world's vehicles is indelible.
Except VW and Stellantis do this since many years...
Offer by Stellantis is 20k EUR (below 30k USD) and EU cars have higher security standards by regulation. https://www.motor1.com/news/691992/stellantis-low-cost-car-p...
Offer by Stellantis is 20k EUR (below 30k USD) and EU cars have higher security standards by regulation. https://www.motor1.com/news/691992/stellantis-low-cost-car-p...
> Except VW and Stellantis do this since many years...
VW is approaching comparable Tesla EV features now, after 10 years in denial and 7 playing catch-up (and while the hardware has improved greatly, the software has improved too but still can't compare to Tesla's). Stellantis is not really faring that well either.
The article opened with "Ford is comparing this to its Model T moment".
Then I read the second paragraph and I thought: "oh, Ford is having its Model T-esla moment". I still recall after >7y the Sandy Munro Tesla's teardown, who was amazed with how much more efficient the wiring, number of components etc were compared to regular industry (I believe this is an updated comparison slide of it: https://cdn.motor1.com/images/custom/comparing-tesla-ford-vw... ).
And the third paragraph delivered... It's an ex-Tesla guy driving this.
I share the hate for the guy in charge, but I agree with the parent comment.
VW is approaching comparable Tesla EV features now, after 10 years in denial and 7 playing catch-up (and while the hardware has improved greatly, the software has improved too but still can't compare to Tesla's). Stellantis is not really faring that well either.
The article opened with "Ford is comparing this to its Model T moment".
Then I read the second paragraph and I thought: "oh, Ford is having its Model T-esla moment". I still recall after >7y the Sandy Munro Tesla's teardown, who was amazed with how much more efficient the wiring, number of components etc were compared to regular industry (I believe this is an updated comparison slide of it: https://cdn.motor1.com/images/custom/comparing-tesla-ford-vw... ).
And the third paragraph delivered... It's an ex-Tesla guy driving this.
I share the hate for the guy in charge, but I agree with the parent comment.
On the other hand, history is littered with car companies that left an indelible impact in the car industry and then went bankrupt.
It's extremely difficult to spend loads of money on R&D without letting your competitors get most of the value of it for nothing.
Yep. Just because you a have a good idea, doesn't mean you can turn it into a profitable business. The graveyard is full of companies that had good ideas.
Cars are a low margin hardware business that's also a highly regulated one where mistakes are expensive. Tough to crack.
Cars are a low margin hardware business that's also a highly regulated one where mistakes are expensive. Tough to crack.
Maybe we should have expanding mining and made the underlying minerals much cheaper as opposed to subsidizing each individual vehicle.