[untitled]
3 comments
Ok, real talk. The implementation is very basic but it's fine, there isn't anything that's very wrong about it at a cursory glance. The choice of having "method style" calls as function pointers is extremely baffling though: you still have to pass a pointer to the vector explicitly (it's C, you have no automatic this), and you are allocating a pointer on the stack for each of the methods of this "class" as though they were virtual methods. What do we gain from this?
> Truly generic in C: type erasure via elem_size — no macros, no code generation, no void* arithmetic in user code.
Did an LLM write this?
Did an LLM write this?
I'm coming to expect that most things you see on the internet are written by an LLM. I can't wait for all the de-LLM denoiser products that're sure to come out combating llm spam.