- The economics surrounding AI development favor those who can commoditize data to the cheapest price. (Silicon Valley, militaries, and finance have AND MUST MAINTAIN their influence over this commoditization) This commoditization requirement was once previously thought as irreversible, allowing dumb money to buy into the idea that “data is the new oil”, but Butterfly War shows how to unexpectedly drive up the liability of a mass accumulation of data commodities.
- Foreign actors and short sellers can now use derivations of the Butterfly War to become market makers of the data economy, forcing the theory of “AI Winters” to be replaced with a more predictive “AI Business Cycle”. (Do you now understand why I went to Soros-influenced actors first?)
- This undesirable pressure, when paired with the institutional dependencies of established AI infrastructure, will force a deeper consolidation of Silicon Valley, military, and financial “cognitive assets”, which in turn will skew the funding and purposes behind additional AI development to be more risk-averse and conservative (from an power preservation standpoint).
- The pressures to embrace “cognitive mercantilism” become irreversible. Nations will aggressively retain talent and technologies for themselves to improve their collective bargaining power on the international stage. /pol/-tier nationalism finally has the footing to stifle their material humanist opposition.
- AI development will enter an artificially induced “deep freeze” period, similar to what happened to space exploration after the Space Race.
- The doctrine of Gnostic Warfare we develop today dominates in this period, focusing primarily on the epistemological limitations of Deep Belief Networks and, more precisely, how these cognitive assets define emotion.
> We use machine learning to evaluate content against our advertiser guidelines.
This means Google violates civil rights law by maintaining a list of phrenological behavior based on racial, sexual, and demographic data.
Advertisers choosing videos to show up in also means selecting which videos to filter out. This means Google has a list of acceptable behavior for blacks, gays, and women to perform such filtering.
https://archive.fo/zP1F1
- The economics surrounding AI development favor those who can commoditize data to the cheapest price. (Silicon Valley, militaries, and finance have AND MUST MAINTAIN their influence over this commoditization) This commoditization requirement was once previously thought as irreversible, allowing dumb money to buy into the idea that “data is the new oil”, but Butterfly War shows how to unexpectedly drive up the liability of a mass accumulation of data commodities.
- Foreign actors and short sellers can now use derivations of the Butterfly War to become market makers of the data economy, forcing the theory of “AI Winters” to be replaced with a more predictive “AI Business Cycle”. (Do you now understand why I went to Soros-influenced actors first?)
- This undesirable pressure, when paired with the institutional dependencies of established AI infrastructure, will force a deeper consolidation of Silicon Valley, military, and financial “cognitive assets”, which in turn will skew the funding and purposes behind additional AI development to be more risk-averse and conservative (from an power preservation standpoint).
- The pressures to embrace “cognitive mercantilism” become irreversible. Nations will aggressively retain talent and technologies for themselves to improve their collective bargaining power on the international stage. /pol/-tier nationalism finally has the footing to stifle their material humanist opposition.
- AI development will enter an artificially induced “deep freeze” period, similar to what happened to space exploration after the Space Race.
- The doctrine of Gnostic Warfare we develop today dominates in this period, focusing primarily on the epistemological limitations of Deep Belief Networks and, more precisely, how these cognitive assets define emotion.