DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

But when you write something like this, do you also understand that their actual research is widely considered to be of a high quality and very important? So if you agree that ethics is important, would you leave them off a top 10 list (and who would you put on)?

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

It is a valid criticism that the headline is clickbaity.

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

It says the high point is 2017, not the last good paper. There are of course other good papers coming out go Google. But the novelty is dropping and the angst is increasing.

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

Ha ha *no agenda, I mean. ..... Maybe my subconscious has an agenda I don't know about :-)

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

More like they are using a hammer to put screw in the wall. But close enough :-)

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

Please read the article. I address some of the issues raised. My point is that Gebru's firing is symptomatic of some deep problems Google are experiencing. Thank you.

DavidSumpter

5년 전discuss

I am the author. I think it is interesting with this "axe to grind" response (there was another above). I am an independent researcher, a professor at a University. And I have absolutely no reason to be disappointed with Google. My knowledge of this subject goes considerably deeper than I write in the article, but it is important to get the points across in an easy to follow manner. Thus I use certain literary devices. But I think it isn't fair to describe my opinion as a "axe to grind". I might (of course) be wrong, but there is agenda.

DavidSumpter

7년 전discuss

I am the professor who translated the article from Swedish. I agree that anyone can be a scientist. But, as you Erikson neither has qualifications, nor does he show understanding and nor does he use the scientific method. So very poor all round.

comments