If you look at data from a few years ago you’re missing the full picture. Cigarette smoking by high school students has been on a heavy decline for the past 20 years. Especially in 2012 when it was already looked down on socially.
We can agree to disagree over Elon Musk, but I can give you a good use case for Ring off the top of my head:
My parents bought a Ring (I am heavily against it for every reason you wrote, plus I can’t stand the idea of a company owning my family’s video footage, I asked them to let me set up some sort of CCTV system but they just want the easy way)and it provides them with a quick, cheap motion activated video feed of their home straight to their phones from anywhere in the world. This isn’t even a doorbell function, the thing can be configured to detect motion over a selection of distances and send you a notification straight to a live video feed.
Sure that can be manually set up but for a lot of people who aren’t too tech savvy, grabbing something like a Ring from bestbuy is quick and easy to get running. Maybe the issue could be helped if a someone sold something like an arduino based doorbell / cam, with easy to use software or an app like Ring that didn’t call back home.
What an asinine way to begin a comment attempting to explain your position. I think it’s safe to say that nobody wishes another human “high on some substance” has the ability to disrupt the control of their vehicle. Where did you even pull that from?
That being said, the people who “should resist more” are the ones don’t find it “trivial” to not rely on cloud service providers. They grab IoT products like a Ring doorbell off the shelf and install it one and done.
Wouldn’t searching for an element in an arbitrary array of size n happen in O(n) time, while only accessing it is considered O(1)? I could understand the search case for something like a hash table being O(1) but does that also apply to your standard array?