Learning with examples is crucial. Personally, I find it easier to grasp mathematical concepts when I encounter them in various real-life scenarios. Similarly, understanding the rationale behind the introduction of a specific concept or definition in a field helps me comprehend it better.
To me, mathematics is a carefully crafted compilation of concepts devised to provide precise descriptions (like cross product, dot product, determinants, derivatives) or simplify and generalize ideas (such as linear maps, wedge product).
In essence, mathematicians create these tools and then analyze them to uncover similarities and patterns.
Would math "exist", if there were no "sensory inputs" at all?
Getting the signal from the noise - A demonstration attempt (inspired by @laurieg's comment):
Rendering: how to turn a virtual 3D scene into a (2D) image?
Answer: (affine and perspective) geometry, usually in the form of vectors and points and some physics.
(Matrices, multivectors, are structures for convenience.)
Where Source is your "old" 2D coordinate system interval (e.g., [-1; 1] x [-1; 1]) and Target is your new coordinate system interval (e.g., [0; Width] x [0; Height]).
Although, we usually have to deal with flipped y-coordinates, so:
Not few operating systems have a C interface.
The implementation of binaries (see also application binary interfaces) depends on the operating system.
Shared libraries (e.g., DLL) are binaries, too.
C compiler developers have the ability to generate consistent[1] binary outputs.
In simpler terms, vendors of these compilers can reach a consensus on how to convert C code into binary files, known as Application Binary Interfaces (ABI).
It is not uncommon[2] to have a foreign function interface in C.
To me, mathematics is a carefully crafted compilation of concepts devised to provide precise descriptions (like cross product, dot product, determinants, derivatives) or simplify and generalize ideas (such as linear maps, wedge product).
In essence, mathematicians create these tools and then analyze them to uncover similarities and patterns.
Would math "exist", if there were no "sensory inputs" at all?