I mean sure, general libertarian "musings" about government=inefficient, whatever.
The actual point he is arguing is unrealistic though, what wealth tax could possibly lead to anyone being taxed 50% of all net-value!?
This family that's scrimping and saving for their 2M slice, either made that money in one fiscal year and so could arguably just be happy with any profit, or as indicated in the thesis didn't.
So sure, don't take half of everything someone has every year. Doesn't really last.
This is clickbait. The author is using a version of the term backdoor, as in an action in a cryptographic system is undertaken on behalf of a user but without that users consent, but is clearly just irate at being associated with a cryptocurrency. This is an idempotent single action, less scary, even in a secure context.
The author clearly was just momentarily angry, used some exaggerated language knowing how it would read and is now trying to stand their ground.
Closest thing to a point I see them making is that generated wallets should include an option to be removed from the attestation list, or be deleted if not wanted to begin with.
Valid (if not slightly petty) user feedback maybe, "BACKDOOR IN SECURE APP ALERT ALERT" definitely not...
It's amazing that all US critical posts are being downvote-bombed...
Also the claim that the US is not lax in its regulation is a bad joke. Half of the parties available literally made de-regulation their damn group mantra...
They're not about to make their own product limit their own whims!