> You're trying to lump people who have legitimate concerns about the covid-19 vaccine in particular
There are no such "legitimate concerns" (or legitimate arguments for that matter). You trying to lump people that are delusional, uneducated, fear-mongering deniers in with rational people that evaluate reality on its own merits is the "very dishonest" part.
> For someone who has already had Covid and recovered, there is no benefit. Only risk
I guess you missed this big-ass bolded part at the bottom:
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
You fucking liar. You fucking merchant of death. You fucking deceiver. If your position were logical, rational, and intellectually honest, you would not have to mis-represent non-peer-reviewed, inconclusive single studies as inarguable truths.
But your position is bullshit, so your arguments must be to.
I work with two. Let's just say they aren't anyone's "go-to" when a problem needs solved, full of right-wing conspiracy bullshit and pointless commentary. One drinks from a "LIBERAL TEARS" mug at work. Can you fucking imagine?
There are no such "legitimate concerns" (or legitimate arguments for that matter). You trying to lump people that are delusional, uneducated, fear-mongering deniers in with rational people that evaluate reality on its own merits is the "very dishonest" part.