I have attributed this experience to the same thing that happens when you look closely to AI-generated images. On the first glance they look great but closer inspection reveals flaws.
Perhaps one just learns to see through the model after a while.
For AI written content I have a very low tolerance. I bounce right away when I notice I'm reading generated content, especially if it tries to be an essay or anything else than direct answer to my question at hand.
When it comes to books, I avoid anything written by an author debuting after 2022 unless there is a strong recommendation by someone close.
As for genres, it has made me read less purely technical books. My assumption is that I can learn enough of the subject as I go by chatting with a model.
>The feedback was simply: "What do you even need funding for?"
Not clear from the text, but what was your plan using the funding on? If you did not have a plan, what did you expect? VCs want to see how adding more money results in asymmetric returns.
I wonder how long he waited for the CPAN nologin case. I remember requesting a CPAN account 3 years back and it took ~2 months for someone to look at and accept.
Past experiences include Cisco (bad incentives, they make a lot of money from certifications and licenses), TP-Link (broke the case physically when pressing a button, was left without updates after some time), Ubiquiti (could not handle the load of my home network. I had the edgerouter-x though which is weak)
Why would your customer invest in your system instead of going directly to stocks/ETFs?
The people holding 10k€+ in cash/ bank savings account that I know are old, tech illiterate, afraid of investing, and oblivious to the effects of inflation. They simply store the money somewhere so they can use it later at a short notice.
With these people you have way too much friction with the Coinbase way. Even if you succeeded in convincing them they deserve yield, it will be hard to compete with investing tools that are integrated into their banking apps that show higher profits than you.
This. In my experience the people actively disliking it have only ever used Jenkins 1 or somewhy only used freestyle jobs.
There are numerous ways to shoot yourself in the foot, though, and everything must be configured properly to get to feature parity with GHA (mail server, plugins, credentials, sso, https, port forwarding, webhooks, GitHub app, ...).
But once those are out of the way, its the most flexible and fastest CI system I have ever used.
>Development fits into the gaps of the day instead of requiring dedicated desk time.
I find myself planning and jotting down things into a notebook while juggling adult/parent responsibilities. On little longer gaps I research. Then when the occasional longer gap happens I'm ready to start cracking on my desktop. I've been only dabbling with AI but have found that writing prompts by hand in the notebook and using the desk time to execute them works well. This also keeps me in the free tier.
Aggregator for finding things to do with kids in Finland.
At a family gathering was asking a relative how his beginner level programming course was going. Was blown away to learn that he had just vibed this and now had already a steadily increasing stream of traffic. I had already used it myself.
Debian stable with KDE desktop on a nth hand desktop computer. Place it in a central place at home. Random probably used office-grade accessories. Install some games and libreoffice on it. Internet access only under supervision before age 10.
Perhaps one just learns to see through the model after a while.