When I learnt that Kodak deleted that Xinjiang photo, I stopped buying their products. Fine to not post initially, but publishing then deleting and apologizing shows weak corporate backbone.
No one is against using AI or coding with agents unless you don't understand what it's doing and you're incapable of reviewing the output. The problem isn't the tool, it's "coders" who unthinkingly trust it without verification.
This is why you don't let Claude handle versioning and the release process. From v0.1.0 to v1.0.0 to v2.0.0, and then suddenly 1.2.0? Semantic versioning isn't quantum mechanics. (Even then, I'll admit it's sometimes hard for me too to decide the right increment when tagging versions. :)
Previously discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28024539