According to this thread from another virus expert [1], you can integrate pretty much every class of viruses in the system the authors of this paper used.
I implore everyone to read the full article and not only the headline. The paper that is being reported on was widely criticized in its scientific community for its weak evidence and should probably be seen (if you are very charitable) only as a starting point for other virus experts to jump into the discussion and do more experiments and not as something for general consumption.
That's a valid, but still weird take to me. Academic publishing takes a very long time. Every paper I was involved in took many months from submission to eventual publishing (completely ignoring the time it takes to prepare a submission).
Ioannidis published something extremely controversial (if not even flawed) and one of the main authors he attacked responded with a lengthy explanation so that this manuscript would not remain unchallenged. I found that aspect way more important than the venue of response. Would you prefer to leave Ioannidis' work unchallenged for potentially months instead?
I would advice to interpret the IFR reported by the Ioannidis paper with an extreme amount of caution. One of the authors criticized (which is quite an understatement) by Ioannidis went into a detailed rebuttal in [1]. A second thread [2] also gives a very detailed analysis of issues with the paper.
If you can recompile but the code was written to only target AVX-512 you can use https://github.com/simd-everywhere/simde to near effortlessly map the intrinsics to AVX2 (or lower).
This still means that tools published in the last few years until now might just be gone soon. The people who uploaded the images might have graduated or moved on and none will be there to save the work.
This will be quite bad for reproducible science. Publishing bioinformatics tools as containers was becoming quite popular. Many of these tools have a tiny niche audience and when a scientist wants to try to reproduce some results from a paper published years ago with a specific version of a tool they might be out of luck.
Here are the per country ratios of different VOC/VOI: https://covariants.org/per-country
It took a while until it became dominant in India, and then a similar pattern repeats in each new country.