Ask Mercedes-Benz. If somehow that repo gets exposed - so are all of your secrets. You just made a problem a lot worse and potentially opened up an avenue to expose more data.
I'm concerned that execs and managers believe discussing thing in-person is more productive when there's lots of evidence that suggests wfh or hybrid is comparable or better.
Two years ago there's wasn't enough data to know what would work long term. There is now.
"The economics will win out in the end". This is what frustrates me. It seems so obvious. Sunk-cost fallacy is a terrible reason to mess with a workers employment.
Wouldn’t it easier for management of this kind to hide? You can’t see that they are not actually doing anything if they are working from home. In the office they have to justify themselves because otherwise they’re just sitting there.
Do you think it's important for a companies culture to evolve as the environment changes? With your FAANG example I have to wonder what else may be stuck that's blocking the organization from doing more. Are they bad at evolving in general or is there something unique about RTO?
I wonder what the responses would have looked like if they had asked about overall quality of live instead of just Mental Health. I personally like a hybrid environment. However, I think I've been more satisfied with life overall since being remote full time - even if I'm not as happy now with how I engage with my job.
“enterprises often find themselves hindered by what are effectively “gaps between the rails,” with no direct connectivity between data, systems, and resources.”
I’m not sure moving to containers solves this unless it’s done intentionally. Bigger orgs will always have different parts of their systems built by different developers. Standardizing how applications are deployed will make it easier for them to work together, but there’s still going to be these gaps.