I consider vim as a tarpit because it accelerates writing text without syntactic recognition. That is, it may inhibit reception of a better programming tool by being just too well designed for what it is used for.
I have personally invested my time in the subject before with varying success. I'd like to see, study and try out your editor, perhaps even to contribute into it.
If someone declines being great simply because someone discourages him, maybe people haven't taught their kids enough courage.
Lets assume we'd have our own nice opinion bubble where nobody says anything bad. What kind of place that would be? Would you also take on things that offend some small group? Or would you take on posts that accidentally manage to be offensive?
There is lot of contradictory information, because there are food industries funding research whose results are favorable for their products. It is no longer science. Rather it's assertion of beliefs.
You just asserted your own beliefs. Wouldn't you rather want to know the truth about good nutrition? You need science to do that.
Plain milk probably is okay, but it easily induces diarrhea. Flavoured, highly processed milk products have too much sugar added in for them to be considered healthy.
But then there's stuff like cheese and yogurt, as long as they're unflavoured they're pretty good.
Check the carbohydrates section on the nutrition label. If it's above 2g, you should limit it's usage. Well.. if you follow this recent research.
Either one of you is in wrong or lying. And I don't know which of you.
Doing some observations. pigeon.ly is layout is html5. The illuminatikarate.com is html4 on wordpress. Pigeon.ly is neatly made bootstrap -powered responsive website, whereas the IK website isn't. But this is just the face-value of the websites. I'd still expect a good web dev to have good, accessible, modern websites though.
This is interesting but the information about this all is inconclusive. I can see that Frederick was wise to answer to this post. It's more obvious now that that the claims haven't been backed up by anything.
So why stereotypical programmer can't get along with stereotypical business person? That's because they're stereotypes.
Stereotypical programmer is a freedom-fighter. They might breach into "locked" systems. They Love to share things. They love quality. A stereotypical business person puts a price for everything and cares only about optimizing profits. These stereotypes are naturally in conflict.
Keep in mind stereotypes do not accurately reflect reality.
The author forgot to point out that every comment you add has a cost. And there was not enough emphasis that the code can go on without comments if you make the code itself clear.
Rather being nonsense, the article meant to be statement against nonsense.
He really doesn't have even a point. Stop thinking about? Move on? To where?
It may not be reality yet, but Linux on the desktop is happening. I see people trying it out, deploying it. There are actual (nontechnical) human beings trying out distributions. And if it's not reality yet, there's thousands of enthusiastic hackers trying to change the reality.
There's no strategy, it cannot be set, and it's not even needed. Besides, Android isn't in any way ideal development direction. It's crippled open source system. Also it's handicapped. It has a java syndrome.
I have personally invested my time in the subject before with varying success. I'd like to see, study and try out your editor, perhaps even to contribute into it.