The WHO's January 20th memo on PCR threshold which advised labs to verify cycles are at a level which doesn't generate a high false positive rate?
“[a]fter thorough investigation, WHO confirmed that the tests were not always being used appropriately and in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer.”
“In particular, users in laboratories encountered problems with these tests when they did not apply the recommended positivity threshold — this can result in either false negative results (if the threshold applied is lower) or false positives (if threshold is higher),” the WHO said.
Unfortunately it's not exactly spelled out for you like that. Can you imagine though?
As seen on a hypothetical NBC Nightly News broadcast: "The government is using its influence over corporate media to shape public opinion in an effort to remove constitutionally protected rights like free speech and the right to assemble.. Now is the time to protest if you want to have any chance at keeping them"
That would never happen. Efforts like this much more hidden and shrouded in secrecy. Out of necessity... They don't want protesting.
The theft of your most sacred rights will not be broadcasted to you before it happens. All of a sudden you'll wake up one day, and they'll be gone. Unless you resist of course.
I'm afraid I see it differently. After years of carefully watching the media, I've realized that they do not have the citizen's best interests at heart. Whatever they're pushing, I'm intensely suspicious of.
Here's an interesting thought experiment for you to conduct:
What if these incidiary figures committing violence, egging on fellow protestors and erecting guillotines at the Capitol were actually bad actors with a nefarious agenda.
The crazier the crowd looks, the easier it is to ram through legislation that curtails the right to dissent. Personally I find it completely believable and considering the events of the last couple years, likely.
Doesn't exactly look worthy of losing our collective freedom of speech and right to assemble over. A stark contrast over the story being pushed in the media.
Yet this event will be used as a scapegoat to push those very things in the near future.
Just know that any laws passed or precedents set will be used first on the "radical right", will undoubtedly be used on the anti-vax and conspiracy crowd but will eventually be used on the anti-war left, and then simply "dissidents".
If you haven't realized it yet, the wheels are turning to silence unapproved narratives forever. The media campaign just screams the phrase "manufacturing consent".
Uh no. A group of yahoos being let into the Capitol to take selfies is not a valid reason to endorse censorship and giving up our collective freedom of speech.
Hmm, did "flat earth" suddenly go out of style for linking ridiculous not-believable conspiracy theories to people who doubt consensus establishment views?
Got it, I'll start shrieking about guitar pedals now whenever anyone starts questioning taking the Covid vaccine.
Disengenous is correct and the media blows their credibility yet again every time they attempt to politicize this.
I read this and thought: oh, another article where the author attempts to say people that don't wholeheartedly trust the mainstream media and their fact checkers are overly emotional conspiracy theorists. This has continued to backfire spectacularly and push their audience away from them and will continue to do so. People aren't stupid.
The only thing missing (thanks to Big Tech censorship) is a strong independent media using actual journalism to deliver information instead of clearly biased reporting.
Ugh, those three listed are widely accepted in truth seeking community to be utter nonsense. They are ridiculed and dismissed as theories planted by shills and three letter agencies to make conspiracy theorists seem crazy. Instead substitute three conspiracy theories truth seekers actually believe: "three World Trade Center buildings fell on 9/11", "fluoride in the water lowers your IQ" and "vaccines are full of contaminants and neurotoxins". Just looking out for you bro.
Is this supposed to scare people away? Lol, talk about an empty argument. See if you can somehow link him to flat earthers or the anti-vax movement as well.
What's funny is the article starts with Flat Earth, a theory even the conspiracy crowd ridicules. There are tons of Flat Earth videos on YouTube to this day. If it's so dangerous, why not censor it site wide like all the videos questioning vaccine safety or pro vs anti-vaxxer debate videos where the anti side appears victorious? Those last only a few days at most.
It's because Flat Earth videos are not meant to be censored. They are meant to stick around no matter what so a wacky, not-believable theory can be linked to the conspiracy crowd in an attempt to discredit them. Don't believe me? Search any conspiracy themed subreddit/forum and see how many users write "this again?"
Same exact thing with Q Anon nonsense. Those videos aren't censored off YouTube, as a matter of fact they're everywhere. Why? Because the media is attempting to link concerns about something legitimate like contaminants in vaccines or hydroxychloroquine actually saving lives with something insane like Q Anon.
QAnon, the theory that Trump is actually working behind the scenes to take down the deep state and elite pedophiles from the inside. Just please everyone.. Do your part by sitting there and waiting. Take no action whatsoever. Keep faith and trust the plan. You still waiting and doing nothing?
Okay perfect. This is working perfectly. Get it?
“[a]fter thorough investigation, WHO confirmed that the tests were not always being used appropriately and in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer.”
“In particular, users in laboratories encountered problems with these tests when they did not apply the recommended positivity threshold — this can result in either false negative results (if the threshold applied is lower) or false positives (if threshold is higher),” the WHO said.