So instead of telling people to install an app that potentially has tracking mechanisms, ads, in-app purchases... users get an instantaneous version without ever leaving search. Well it's hard to feel sympathy for you.
>First of all, to give words to the obvious question here: what leads a group of people to flaunt their insanely unethical desire to profit from <insert antonym of freedom>? They are literally trumpeting the ability for their clients to forcibly copy data without the permission of the owner of the device in question. Is it just money? Is it that simple?
If you ask around I'm sure most people think LE should be able to do this for security reasons. Not saying I agree or disagree but that's the way it is.
You are only forced to enter your passphrase when you turn on the mobile and once every X days. The rest of the time you can use your fingerprint to unlock the mobile. Seems like a good compromise.
Your message seems to say that countries must accept immigrants/refugees left and right otherwise they are some kind of dystopian nightmare. I disagree and I think disagreeing with that is a completely normal political stance. A country owes itself to its citizens--nothing more, nothing less.
The usual argument in the anti-Chrome threads, which I agree with, is that it's very hard or even impossible to create a new browser and maintain it because of how many features exist and must be supported. Even Microsoft failed.
But, I'm sorry, I have nothing to propose on how to simplify the web. And it would also be offtopic here in this thread... :-) I just believe that adding complexity is most of the time a bad idea.