HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

foobarqux

no profile record

Submissions

Apple to Raise Prices Due to Memory Chip Crunch

wsj.com
42 points·by foobarqux·24일 전·19 comments

OpenAI, Pentagon add more surveillance protections to AI deal

axios.com
3 points·by foobarqux·4개월 전·2 comments

You're Thinking About AI and Water All Wrong

wired.com
3 points·by foobarqux·7개월 전·0 comments

LLM probabilities cannot distinguish between possible and impossible language

arxiv.org
2 points·by foobarqux·10개월 전·0 comments

comments

foobarqux
·8일 전·discuss
108 dB is the proposed FAA allowable pressure at the surface of the earth. They didn't come up with this number arbitrarily they did it with consultation with the supersonic plane companies and if those companies could achieve much less than 108dB then the proposed limit would be lower.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
Obviously it is assumed we are talking about frequencies in the range of the audio spectrum (which a sonic boom is). Your point has nothing to do with the dB scale.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
Where is this claim?
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
They are in fact the same. 108dB loud.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
The initial boom is less than a second but it's like standing right next to the leafblower (not across the street) and is accompanied a lasting thundering-noise which is also extremely loud.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
There is a substantial noise beyond the initial boom which is very loud even relative to the main boom. But even just a half second of a car horn going off right next to you every so often is intolerable.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
> It’s not accurate to convert .1 psf to dB because it’s an impulsive shape, not a continuous tone. And human loudness perception depends on how smooth (low frequency) the shape is

Sorry can you explain more? It's just the definition of dB (?)

And it's less impulsive than you imagine, go to youtube to listen to the sonic boom + continuous roar.

The FAA has no criteria about the "texture" of the sound and there is no reason to believe the allowed planes will differ substantially in this respect compared to every other supersonic aircraft in the past.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
The proposed limit is around the level of standing right next to a leaf blower.
foobarqux
·10일 전·discuss
0.11 pound per square foot is what is being proposed. That's 108 decibels. Which is between standing next to a lawn mower and standing next to a car horn. I don't see how anyone will tolerate that in practice.

https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/db
foobarqux
·16일 전·discuss
What is Rogue-like about this?
foobarqux
·지난달·discuss
llm-cmd-comp is the best of these types of tools.

https://github.com/CGamesPlay/llm-cmd-comp
foobarqux
·2개월 전·discuss
....

     function repology() {
         curl -L --user-agent 'hackernews' \
             "http://repology.org/api/v1/project/$@"
    }
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
What is a better option?
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
I'm saying you can go even further and automate the entire thing using LLMs/agents, it is pretty much the ideal use case: you have a black-box reference implementation to test against; descriptive documentation for what the functions should do; some explicitly supplied examples in the documentation; and the ability to automatically create an arbitrary number of tests.

So not only do you have a closed loop system that has objective/automatic pass-fail criteria you also don't even have to supply the instructions about what the function is supposed to do or the test cases!

Obviously this isn't going to be 100% reliable (especially for edge cases) but you should be able to get an enormous speed up. And in many cases you should be able to supply the edge case tests and have the LLM fix it.

(Codex is still free for the next few days if you want to try their "High"/"Extra high" thinking models)
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
Have you considered using quickcheck/random/property-based testing with LLM code generation to automate function implementation?
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
How is the popularity/rank in functions.csv determined?
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
No, the difference is that the government agrees to no "unlawful" use as determined by the government.

Anthropic said that mass surveillance was per se prohibited even if the government self-certified that it was lawful.
foobarqux
·4개월 전·discuss
No, the difference is that the government agrees to no "unlawful" use as determined by the government.

Anthropic said that mass surveillance was per se prohibited even if the government self-certified that it was lawful.
foobarqux
·6개월 전·discuss
It feels like gnu parallel with --transfer-file would have solved this problem
foobarqux
·6개월 전·discuss
Their first example is bad:

    ps aux | grep nginx | grep root | grep -v grep
can be done instead (from memory, not at a Linux machine ATM):

    ps -u root -C nginx
which is arguably better than their solution:

    psc 'process.name == "nginx" && process.user == "root"'