All these articles about this, but I've never seen anyone mention whether or not a pardon has been requested.. which is arguably the most important thing in determining whether or not a pardon will be granted.
I went from a note 3 to an s7. Like you I never really utilized the stylus, and even though I had 3 extra batteries for my note, I'm still mostly ok with the tradeoff.
The size of the phones is nearly identical.
As you mention, the only thing that I dislike is not having a hardware menu key.. but it's worth looking into as a decent replacement phone.
In this particular case you're comparing apples to oranges.
Shotguns are very different from a standard .38
First is the obvious difference in projectiles, which can make a huge difference.
Second the .38 (in all likelihood) was a pistol, whereas a shotgun is a rifle. A pistol you can hold it to the side of your head and pull the trigger.. you can't really do this well with a shotgun, which means you're more than likely going to put the gun under your chin and try to get to your brain the long way.
It's somewhat logical that someone might need to shoot themselves twice with a shotgun, not so much with a .38.
In this particular case you're comparing apples to oranges.
Shotguns are very different from a standard .38
First is the obvious difference in projectiles, which can make a huge difference.
Second the .38 (in all likelihood) was a pistol, whereas a shotgun is the length of a rifle. A pistol you can hold it to the side of your head and pull the trigger.. you can't really do this well with a shotgun, which means you're more than likely going to put the gun under your chin and try to get to your brain the long way.
It's somewhat logical that someone might need to shoot themselves twice with a shotgun, not so much with a .38.
While this makes perfect sense and works great in the rest of the world, ID numbers in the US have been talked about, but have faced resistance from two groups.. those that think that this is somehow an invasion of privacy, and those that think that this somehow correlates with the 'mark of the beast' and signals the end of humanity according to the bible. (not joking)
So you read the part where it said he does many speeches for free yet decided it worthwhile to create an estimate that you know doesn't align with reality and draw conclusions from it?
You're definitely an outlier though, and no one is saying that it's not possible, it's just that the interface of a tablet (or lack thereof) presents an un-necessary hurdle that needs to be overcome.
My company is responsible for a number of different school districts, and I've seen this happen at all of them, despite them being warned about the outcome beforehand.
I have no idea how he came up with his rant either. The article says little to nothing along the lines of what he claims.
Only at the end of the article, someone else other than the author is quoted as saying that negative health outcomes can't be blamed on just your gut biome, but poor lifestyle choices as well.
Somehow this guy took this one statement, which is wholly correct and only points out the obvious, and turned it around to interpret the entire article as fat-shaming, and somehow misses the article's main purpose which is the lack of diversity in current data comparisons in this area of research.
The author says exactly what you're saying. They're pointing out that it's not so much what you're putting into your body as what you're comparing it to, and right now we're not comparing it to large enough or a diverse enough samples of the population.
I'm not sure about twitter, but for Facebook fake likes actually hurt you because they use algorithms to figure out what to display and to who. The more fake likes you have, the less likely people who actually liked your page are to have your post show up in their feeds.
Actually they are meant to be depicted as small for a reason, or at least this is what I was taught by multiple university professors.
The reason a depiction of a smaller penis was preferred is that it was a sign of fertility. Men with smaller penises were seen as genetically more likely to be able to impregnate a woman, and thus was a desired trait at the time.
From the second response on your quora link:
>The ancient Greeks believed that short penises allowed the man's seed to travel a lesser distance before entering the woman's body and impregnating her. A small penis was seen as being more virile. A long penis meant the seed had further to travel, and had less chance of impregnating a woman.
While I tend to lean more to your side of the argument, the devil's advocate in me has to point out the fact that you leave out the massive costs of research, development, clinical trials / fda approval, etc. that go in to getting a drug to market.
This not to mention all the extra capital needed to fund research into all of the drugs that never make it to market before a company finds something that works.
In Europe people tend to care more about these things because they're interested in creating a good healthy workplace. If you only wrote about your professional achievements, it would be a sign that your lack of a personality could cause problems within the workplace.
Everyone is different and there is no one-size-fits-all thing here that works for every country / job opportunity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_the_Pardon_Attorney