HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

iDont17

no profile record

comments

iDont17
·작년·discuss
[flagged]
iDont17
·작년·discuss
[dead]
iDont17
·작년·discuss
Why make AI then if intelligence is electrical activity in a substrate is everywhere.

We’re engineering nothing novel at great resource cost and appropriation of agency.

Good job we made the models in the textbook “real”?

Wasted engineering if it isn’t teaching us anything physics hadn’t already decades ago, then. Why bother with it?

Edit: and AGI is impossible… ones light cone does not extend far enough to accurately learn; training on simulation is not sufficient to prepare for reality. Any machine we make will eventually get destroyed by some composition of space time we/the machine could not prepare for.
iDont17
·작년·discuss
See DuoLingo CEOs comments recently.

Tech CEOs are disassociated loons.

Zero obligation in life to do anything for themselves. Just stare at the geometry of reality and emit some empty thought speak.

Just the new church leadership; we all serve them like mommy has since childhood.

These people are absolutely pathetic and entitled children coddled by wealth.
iDont17
·작년·discuss
Yeh, exactly. Code doesn’t matter. Correct and stable electrical states matter.

Energy based models and machines that boot strap from models, organize their state to a prompt are on their way. The analog hole for coders is closing.

Most software out there is the layers of made up tools and such to manage and deploy software. We’ll save a lot of cycles pruning it all for generic patterns.

5-10 more years it’s all hardware again. Then no longer need to program a computer like it’s 1970.