i wonder if it's partially because it's not a unique business model and subject to yet another VC-subsidized race to the bottom on things like token prices
agreed, unless you need to use all models i'm sitting here wondering why orgs would want to introduce third party risk into their pipelines for marginal cost and time savings
The parent company should face severe penalties for allowing this kind of breach to happen and also for terrorist financing. We are really living in the Stone Age of information security.
as someone who is working in the cybersecurity space and recently obtained my CISSP designation, i am left wondering when the pedagogy of my field will expand and include a separate domain dedicated to AI agent safety and security best practices
it really does feel like we are way behind in the way we train people in cyber compared to the pace of the development of agentic AI, robotics etc
is it unrealistic to think the companies that benefit from orgs such as this could donate a fraction of a percent of their wealth to keep them going? the responsibility always seems to fall most on those with the least resources.