HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jdasdf

no profile record

comments

jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
I'm my experience claude code is kind of shit.

Pi works very well with deepseek though
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
> The big flaw in his argument is that a mere 1% which is actually 20% of annual return is still less than the average income tax rate on workers

This is untrue btw

50% of people in the US pay effectively no net taxes
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
>If that is what is being targeted, then why not actually target that. Apply some percent taxation on the current value of all assets transferred because of death.

That already exists. The rate is 40% of the asset value.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
As per the thread, the hardware is bricked and requires a full OS reinstall
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
The comentator either wasn't talking about the company as a whole, or was mistaken.

This is public information. Their financial statements show clearly that they made a loss every single year since the data is available.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NET/cloudflare/inc...
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
CEOs are democratically elected. And if they do a bad job they are democratically removed from office.

What are you talking about??
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
>For instance - If overhiring happened, how is this not at least a little bit on the individual that approved of a hiring spree? Why is it that they should be able to yield a baton that hurts the workers they hired, without having to actual bare the brunt of the decisions?

Do you think shareholders do not consider their employees performance when deciding to hire/keep them?

Do you think CEOs don't do that when it comes to their executive team?

Do you think the executive team doesn't consider that?

It all comes flowing down.

I can assure you as a shareholder i am 100% focused on getting a return, and I will fire (or vote to fire) any executives that i believe are doing a bad job, or who accept that their underlings do a bad job.

Hiring people, and then firing them some time later is not intrinsically the same as doing a bad job, nor does it mean there was "overhiring".

Also. "hurts workers"? What?

Workers receive the payments that were agree to, for the period that was agreed to. No more, no less.

You are no more entitled to a job than the supermarket is entitled to my patronage, and me choosing to no longer purchase from you, whether it be groceries or labor, is not me hurting you.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
Why should people who are profitable to employ be laid off as well?

It just sounds like you're upset and want to hurt whoever you feel is responsible for making you upset. That's not a productive stance to have on important topics.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
They don't have a PE ratio. They have never made a profit.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
Cloudflare has never made a profit.

Is your stance that shareholders should perpetually subsidize it out of the goodness of their hearts?
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
While that does sound interesting, I don't see any benefit for me.

It would still ultimately exfiltrate the data outside of my control, and frankly i don't trust any "secure enclave" tech.

As far as i'm concerned physical access is root access, and for any private stuff that is wholly unacceptable.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
I just use the API directly. It's simple enough to setup and i like the control i get from just charging up and not having to worry about any random subscription taking money out of my account
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
I've been using v4 pro for the past few days and honestly in terms of quality it seems more or less on par with open AIs 5.4 or opus 4.6 (i havent tried 4.7)

To be clear, i'm not doing state of the art stuff. I mostly used it for frontend development since i'm not great at that and just need a decent looking prototype.

But for my purposes it's a perfectly good model, and the price is decent.

I can't wait for open model small enough for me to run locally come out though. I hate having to rely on someone elses machines (and getting all my data exfiltrated that way)
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
You request the judge to apply a lien on their assets. You take that to their bank and request that it be applied, and the money paid out.

If that doesn't work, you can always go to the police/bailiff with the court order and schedule a date/time for them to go with you to their offices to seize and auction off their stuff.
jdasdf
·2개월 전·discuss
Such censorship shouldn't exist in the first place.
jdasdf
·3개월 전·discuss
most laws enforce agreements.
jdasdf
·4개월 전·discuss
thats the point
jdasdf
·4개월 전·discuss
It is that easy.

Those regulations are choices. You can make different choices. You can make them tomorrow.

I'm sorry but i cannot take seriously any problem that essentially boils down to "We want it to be like this".
jdasdf
·4개월 전·discuss
>But it does show a number of problems inherent in Germany's current situation: (a) shortage of skilled laborers; (b) high cost of labor; and (c) exorbitantly much red tape. These three points alone are among the most frequently cited factors that companies feel inhibit business, and it holds across disciplines.

There are 9 billion people in the world, roughly half of them are perfectly capable of doing manual labor.

There is plenty of skilled labor, and the cost is frankly not that high, you just need to let them work.

Can we be serious here? There is one and only one cause of "high housing prices" and that is a political choice to make housing expensive.

Don't tell people what they can or can't do with their property.

Don't prevent people from being brought in to build stuff.

Do these 2 things and housing will be built if the price is truly high. Anything else is bullshit.
jdasdf
·4개월 전·discuss
>but at least £200bn will be sucked out of the UK economy back to investors

That's not how the economy works... Nothing gets "sucked out of the economy", and certainly not a productive investment that generated that income.